|
Author
|
Topic: Army chooses a new handgun....maybe?
|
Leonard
HMFIC
Member # 2
|
posted January 21, 2017 10:39 AM
So, looks like we get the Sig. way too rich for my blood and in 9mm Lugar? WTF?
I'm looking for a few million military surplus Beretta's to become available. As "somebody" said; WHY?
Read on~
http://dailycaller.com/2017/01/20/army-picks-sig-sauer-to-replace-handgun-after-3-year-search/
Good hunting. El Bee
PS while they are raving about the "new" 9mm in +P+, and becoming reasonably familiar with the 40S&W, I'd kinda like to know why the hell they didn't go whole hog and select a Springfield XP in 10MM?
--------------------
EL BEE Knows It All and Done It All.
Don't piss me off!
Posts: 31465 | From: Upland, CA | Registered: Jan 2003
| IP: Logged
|
|
Kokopelli
SENIOR DISCOUNT & Dispenser of Sage Advice
Member # 633
|
posted January 21, 2017 01:46 PM
So..............the Air Force is hauling nukes around in B-24s that are about a 100 years old as part of our first line of defense but the tried and proven 1911 isn't good enough for the smelly little camel shaggers our guys will come up against ????????
--------------------
And lo, the Light of the Trump shown upon the Darkness and the Darkness could not comprehend it.
Posts: 7583 | From: Under a wandering star | Registered: Apr 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
Leonard
HMFIC
Member # 2
|
posted January 26, 2017 06:43 AM
How much did they spend and then decide on another 9mm? How did they get a deal for $200?
For that matter, why did they decide the 1911 was obsolete, in the first place?
What is this all about?
Good hunting. El Bee
--------------------
EL BEE Knows It All and Done It All.
Don't piss me off!
Posts: 31465 | From: Upland, CA | Registered: Jan 2003
| IP: Logged
|
|
4949shooter
SECOND PLACE HIGGINS (MAGNUM P.I.) LOOK A LIKE CONTEST
Member # 3530
|
posted January 26, 2017 12:18 PM
I wish I knew. It seems the army specified a "modular" system from the beginning so non-modular designs like Glock were out.
Was this planned from the beginning? Don't know for sure but the scuttlebut is flying.
My LE agency tested the P320 along side the Glock 19. During the torture test they melted the 320 down while the Glock kept chugging along.
This whole process and procurement makes me wonder (out loud).
Posts: 2274 | From: New Jersey | Registered: Dec 2009
| IP: Logged
|
|
Az-Hunter
Hi, I'm Vic WELCOME TO THE U.S. Free baloney sandwiches here
Member # 17
|
posted January 26, 2017 01:24 PM
And if you do some digging, as in looking what handgun the elite forces, SEALS etc carry....it's bound to be some flavor of customized 1911 platform, and you can bet it won't be chambered in 9mm. Makes one wonder why a semi-custom factory 1911, still wouldn't work for regular forces?
[ January 26, 2017, 01:25 PM: Message edited by: Az-Hunter ]
Posts: 1629 | From: 5 miles west of Tim | Registered: Jan 2003
| IP: Logged
|
|
Kokopelli
SENIOR DISCOUNT & Dispenser of Sage Advice
Member # 633
|
posted January 26, 2017 01:28 PM
Couldn't be that women and those with limp wrists in o bama's military couldn't qualify with the more powerful .45 could it ??????
--------------------
And lo, the Light of the Trump shown upon the Darkness and the Darkness could not comprehend it.
Posts: 7583 | From: Under a wandering star | Registered: Apr 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
Leonard
HMFIC
Member # 2
|
posted January 26, 2017 02:09 PM
I have ALWAYS questioned the decision to drop the 45Auto in favor of a Beretta 9mm. Then, it takes them a couple wars over 20 years to conclude that the M9 just doesn't cut it? What did they say was spent in evaluation all the submissions before selecting the Sig? Was it $350 Million? I think so?
You can get an Ed Brown 1911 for three grand, but there are others, that don't cost that much, even the Delta Elite is getting renewed interest.
There are lot's of people that are died in the wool traditionalists and carry chopped and channeled 45's and "long slides" and I couldn't begin to count the number of variations available, whether you stick with 45ACP or 10mm.
Damn, it just doesn't seem all that complicated and yet these assholes have the nerve to buy a half a billion dollars worth of 9mm's, regardless of whether they are made by a Swiss company or made by an American company in America.
What exactly do they mean by "modular"? Is one of the specifications that it be striker fired or is that optional? Can we assume that they wouldn't buy a polymer handgun? How about alloy? Should the Service pistol be steel? I don't know if weight is a consideration, but for my money, I would prefer some kind of steel, exotic or nickel alloy of some kind.
With the numbers being talked about it seems they should be able to negotiate the cost down below 800/1000 per each?
All these "progressives" and friggin' Liberals have been trying to step on the 1911s windpipe for 100 years, but they still can't choke the life out of it.
You know the old story about the Army's problems in killing Philippine Muslims , (what else?) Tribesmen back in the 1890s and all the testing that determined a minimum of 45 caliber, as tested on live hogs, how did they manage to forget lessons learned?
Anybody, hello, you testers out there, ever heard of Jeff Cooper? Did it all come down to double action versus single action? Or, like ko ko says, the selection was designed around the needs of Chelsea Manning's delicate little hands? More politically correct bullshit. I still say, get the cunts and the fags out of at least the ground forces.
Yeah howdy. I just don't want to share a foxhole with any chick or Boy George. Okay, I'm old, but tell you what, we aren't going to win any wars with SNOWFLAKES on the battlefield. Or, picture some pussy, (that probably outranks me) going to pick me up and carry me back to our own lines, in a downpour, while dodging snipers and land mines? Bad idea, Barry!
Good hunting. El Bee
--------------------
EL BEE Knows It All and Done It All.
Don't piss me off!
Posts: 31465 | From: Upland, CA | Registered: Jan 2003
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
Printer-friendly view of this topic
