This is topic latest shooting in forum Member forum at The New Huntmastersbbs!.


To visit this topic, use this URL:
https://www.huntmastersbbs.com/cgi-bin/cgi-ubb/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=6;t=004346

Posted by Leonard (Member # 2) on December 02, 2015, 02:43 PM:
 
Well, the body count is 14, right in the middle of San Bernardino, about twenty miles from here.

Shooters all got away, at this point with no information, I'm guessing it's ISIS.

Will we ever know, because they got away scott free?
 
Posted by Leonard (Member # 2) on December 02, 2015, 02:48 PM:
 
Like I have been saying, the Media has exploded. The chief of police doesn't know anything, except there was 2 or 3 perps and they had long guns. Don't know what kind. I guess whey can't pick up shell casings and find out if it's 223 or 7.62X39?
 
Posted by Lone Howl (Member # 29) on December 02, 2015, 03:49 PM:
 
Looks like they had a shootout with em? One cop hit, one shooter on the run.(on foot)
Mark

[ December 02, 2015, 03:49 PM: Message edited by: Lone Howl ]
 
Posted by booger (Member # 3602) on December 03, 2015, 06:36 AM:
 
I bet the liberals heads exploded last night when they found out both of the shooters were Muslim...FBI guy made comments that led me to believe they weren't ruling out terrorism.

Let's hope they call a spade a spade and not classify it 'workplace violence' again if indeed they find out it was a terror act.

[ December 03, 2015, 06:39 AM: Message edited by: booger ]
 
Posted by Leonard (Member # 2) on December 03, 2015, 07:08 AM:
 
Even afraid to release the names until they could soften the message, hey the guy's a US citizen....therefore, you know?

As I have been saying; the Media jumping all over this shit just glamorizes mass murder and breeds more, lately, practically every week!

They need to tone it down! Not so much for we peons, but for the unbalanced and radicals out there.

This will not turn out well. Eventually they will wear us down and disarm us, for our own good, of course.

Good hunting. El Bee
 
Posted by booger (Member # 3602) on December 03, 2015, 09:04 AM:
 
Spot on, LB. Like I said in my post about Paris...Obama and the ruling elites have to think for us stupid folks outside Washington.

We are just too dumb for our own good, and unable to make decisions on our own.

The bodies were still warm yesterday when the Screech Hag Clinton was calling for more gun control. O'Malley was vilifying the NRA, and Communist Sanders was drooling something about gun control as well.

One paper in New York had a headline that read, 'God isn't fixing this', or something like that...it was in response to the Republicans issuing statements saying we should pray for the families of the deceased and hurt.

Numbnuts just made a statement that this MIGHT be terrorism, or it could just be 'workplace violence'...I wondered how long it would take before he had this crap coming out of his mouth.

[ December 03, 2015, 09:38 AM: Message edited by: booger ]
 
Posted by Leonard (Member # 2) on December 03, 2015, 10:31 AM:
 
You can bet your ass, that unless there is absolutely no way to avoid the obvious, they will insist this SB deal isn't TERRORISM. You silly!

As far as I am concerned, there is the mid east sounding name, the fact that the attack is straight out of the terrorist playbook, boobytraps tossing bombs at pursuers, visiting Saudi Arabia.

If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, it's a duck; to anybody but a friggin' Liberal who sees urgent need to take our guns away. Don't forget, all these guns involved were purchased legally, no loopholes, they weren't even on the NO FLY LIST that they have been ragging about lately.

One man interviewed said he was highly suspicious of the goings on, middle eastern men in and out of the house, BUT DIDN'T REPORT IT BECAUSE HE DIDN'T WANT TO BE ACCUSED OF RACISM !

See, that's another thing we can thank Liberals for. Don't worry about Mosques, and Syrian refugees, because Republicans are afraid of widows and three year old orphans!
 
Posted by Aznative (Member # 506) on December 03, 2015, 01:51 PM:
 
I bet the NSA and the FBI spends more time watching guys like us that they spend watching Muslims.
 
Posted by Kokopelli (Member # 633) on December 03, 2015, 02:58 PM:
 
Well, yeah.
We're members of the evil NRA, use guns and kill things.
Where-as;
muslims belong to the religion of peace and tolerance.
Plus, most of us are Conservatives and most muslims are liberals......so.......who ya gonna need to watch ????

[Eek!]
 
Posted by Leonard (Member # 2) on December 03, 2015, 03:41 PM:
 
Dickweed is in complete denial. This terrorist act is a no brainer for anybody but a hard left Liberal.This guy is so fucked up it's hard to understand. I have said it before and I will say it again, Liberalism is a mental illness.

Good hunting. El Bee
 
Posted by 4949shooter (Member # 3530) on December 05, 2015, 03:04 AM:
 
The FBI is now admitting this to be an act of terrorism. Kudos to them for coming out against their commander in beef.

Great response by the local LEO's. Free trip to 72 virgins courtesy of the San Bernardino Police Department:

San Bernardino Shooter Syed Farook -- Moments After Final Gun Battle (PHOTO)

http://www.tmz.com/2015/12/04/san-bernardino-shooter-syed-farook-dead-photo/

[ December 05, 2015, 03:04 AM: Message edited by: 4949shooter ]
 
Posted by Prune Picker (Member # 4107) on December 05, 2015, 05:13 PM:
 
So it's been over 48 hrs. since the TERRORIST ATTACK in San Bernardino & the HNIC is still mum . He must not have the tv turned on in his motel room or he's deep in thought over "the worlds most important issue climate change". It seems odd to me that it took him about 15 minutes to label the murder spree at the slaughter house / abortion clinic in Colorado the act of a "paranoid redneck baptist republican". Am I missing something or does this counterfeit, racist, son of a bitch have a clue what what a TERRORIST ATTACK is?
 
Posted by CrossJ (Member # 884) on December 05, 2015, 06:19 PM:
 
Don't worry PP.....he is scheduled to lecture us all those that watch) sunday evening. Any guesses what he will say?
 
Posted by 4949shooter (Member # 3530) on December 06, 2015, 03:16 AM:
 
He will probably label this as "domestic" terrorism.

Propelled by global warming and the NRA..
 
Posted by Leonard (Member # 2) on December 06, 2015, 06:58 AM:
 
....and we need comprehensive gun control and universal background checks. Citizens can't go around defending themselves without proper training, because there is a good chance that their weapon will be used against them. And, don't ever forget, Islam is a religion of peace. Blah, Blah, Blah.

The only thing that asshole was ever good at is speechifying, and lecturing, while pointing out what's wrong with the American people. Yes, he's good at pointing out our flaws, of which we appear to have many? Especially, misunderstanding the peaceful poor misunderstood muslims.

It will be the same old, same old. Nothing is ever new with Barry. He's never on our side. And, we voted for him, twice!

Good hunting. El Bee
 
Posted by Kokopelli (Member # 633) on December 06, 2015, 07:54 AM:
 
Well, somebody 'splain this to me;
It's been suggested that maybe it's time to build a data base on muslims in this country.......and the liberals had a hissy fit.
But........when I show my Concealed Weapon Permit to buy a new handgun, doesn't the `background check` go thru a data base that the government has compiled on gun owners ???????
Funny that the liberals were ok with that one.

[Eek!]
 
Posted by DanS (Member # 316) on December 06, 2015, 09:21 AM:
 
I strongly believe Ann Coulter when she says liberals have brain damage. The damn liberals want to restrict our constitution rights when it comes to the second amendment, labeling it as just "common sense" or some other bullshit spin term they like to use, "for the children" comes to mind here also.

Yet when someone suggest a database for groups such as muslims, who we know are murdering, terrorist insects, that some need to be exterminated, the libs go batshit crazy about their rights and all.
 
Posted by CrossJ (Member # 884) on December 06, 2015, 09:43 AM:
 
I'm sure we will hear the term "common sense" and "thats not who 'we' are".... Any wagers as to how many times? Who will give the republican response?
 
Posted by Prune Picker (Member # 4107) on December 06, 2015, 10:05 AM:
 
Cross, it's funny you mention it, I've been trying to establish the over/under number on the "uuuuhhhhhh's he will mumble today . I'll set the Total @ 13 , which includes "common sense" , "that's not who we are" & "uuuuhhhhhh's.
 
Posted by DanS (Member # 316) on December 06, 2015, 10:06 AM:
 
Don't leave out "Robust, comprehensive, or the right thing to do".
 
Posted by Prune Picker (Member # 4107) on December 06, 2015, 12:12 PM:
 
I'm sorry Dan, It was my turn to make Sunday Brunch . It's obvious we are all aware of "re-run" and his generic blabbering. I'll have to do the numbers again , but off the top of my head I will take a guess & raise the total to 14.5 .
Any ties will require the use of the correct secret word for keeping us safe from the idiots studder-laced speech tonite. My guess on the total is Under,
My guess for the tie-breaker secret word is... gun control.
 
Posted by CrossJ (Member # 884) on December 06, 2015, 01:03 PM:
 
14.5 on 'uuhhhhh', 'common sense' and 'not who we are'.....I'll take the Overs.

Secret tie breaker word/phrase.....religion of peace.

Any thoughts on the republican response? Will there be one?
 
Posted by Leonard (Member # 2) on December 06, 2015, 01:03 PM:
 
If I hear; "That's not who we are" I might throw a shoe at my TV? But, I will watch. They say this will be his third speech on the subject in 3 days. What a man! He sure knows what to do and when to do it! I'm hoping for a lengthly lecture, we sure need one, and shame on us for being scared of widows and three year old orphans.

Cause, that's not who we are. SMASH
 
Posted by Prune Picker (Member # 4107) on December 06, 2015, 01:34 PM:
 
You guys are cracking me up! I honestly thought my low/lack of tolerance level was in question. Normally I just change channels or switch to SirusXM music when one of "them" starts hogging the tv. I had the misfortune of hearing hillerie screaming for more gun control, but for only 30 seconds till I found the remote. LB, don't destroy the tv, that mite be considered "shifting the blame" & Cross, your choice has a daylight lead so far.
 
Posted by DanS (Member # 316) on December 06, 2015, 06:15 PM:
 
awe, too bad for me, I guess I missed the community organizers speech.
 
Posted by Leonard (Member # 2) on December 07, 2015, 07:48 AM:
 
Yeah, I did too. So, I made up for it this morning, via YouTube.

Mostly Blah Blah Blah, but, for sure our strategy is working! And, it's ISIL, not ISIS, thank you.

Now, the main thing is to make sure terrorists (and citizens) cannot get their hands on "powerful assault weapons firing semi automatic". Better to be completely helpless and dependent on the FBI, who needed three days just to figure out that this act was actually terrorism. And, thanks to Barry for allowing the FBI to say this; when a dumb cluck like me had it figured out in a couple hours....

So, just doing my duty as the HMFIC to keep y'alls informed and current.

Good hunting. El Bee
 
Posted by Kokopelli (Member # 633) on December 07, 2015, 08:01 AM:
 
I suppose that once these peaceful & tolerant muslims set off a `dirty bomb` that o bama will call for total gun control.

And to think that there are still people who support this ass clown and his afterbirth clone, the Hildabeast.

[Eek!]
 
Posted by Aznative (Member # 506) on December 07, 2015, 09:01 AM:
 
Koko: in response to your statement about the NICS system. In Arizona, you do not go through the NICS system when you show your concealed weapons permit because you have already been vetted if you have a CCW. Some states charge a fee to run the back ground checks and want the income from those fees. Colorado does this to their CCW holders.
 
Posted by Kokopelli (Member # 633) on December 07, 2015, 10:05 AM:
 
I stand corrected, but the fact remains that somewhere the government maintains information on me as a gun owner who carries concealed.

I remember when the system was first implemented there was someone in Calif. buying two weapons at the same time and was charged $$ for two separate background checks. I know that he made a legal issue of it but never did hear how it turned out.
I'm sure that the money went to a good cause......probably anti-gun Di-Fi's armed bodyguard's salary or some such worthy cause.
 
Posted by knockemdown (Member # 3588) on December 07, 2015, 10:28 AM:
 
 -
 
Posted by knockemdown (Member # 3588) on December 07, 2015, 10:30 AM:
 
...aaaaaaaaand, guess who those "rebels" morphed into?

I'll give ya a hint: it starts with "I" and ends with "S" (or an L, if you're hidin' shit)...
 
Posted by CrossJ (Member # 884) on December 07, 2015, 11:25 AM:
 
quote:
the fact remains that somewhere the government maintains information on me as a gun owner who carries concealed.
Though I completely understand and support your stance on this, to me its just a drop in the bucket. States with bio metric fingerprinting, facial recognition software and data bases made off of DL pics have gone alot further to creating a 'big brother' type gov't. Just look at the data 'they' already have accumulated off of all of us through financial records ie credit cards, loans etc. Frank-Dodd did as much to jeopardize individual liberty as the patriot act. I guess thats why I never understood the anti facebook argument of staying under the radar by abstaining...if you believe that, you are kidding yourself. We all have a file!!!

Maintain
 
Posted by Leonard (Member # 2) on December 07, 2015, 12:01 PM:
 
Okay, but that's not why I have never had a facebook account. I think facebook is a bunch of socialist control freaks. The list of things and reasons why they take certain actions and decline to take certain reasonable actions is far too long. They are sole judge of what's objectionable and permissible. Fuck facebook.
 
Posted by UTcaller (Member # 8) on December 07, 2015, 12:13 PM:
 
Yep. What Leonard said
 
Posted by Lone Howl (Member # 29) on December 07, 2015, 01:11 PM:
 
.

[ December 07, 2015, 01:12 PM: Message edited by: Lone Howl ]
 
Posted by CrossJ (Member # 884) on December 07, 2015, 04:07 PM:
 
Fair enough.....but abstention won't keep you off 'the list'.
 




Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.0