This is topic Lyin' King in forum Member forum at The New Huntmastersbbs!.
To visit this topic, use this URL:
https://www.huntmastersbbs.com/cgi-bin/cgi-ubb/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=6;t=003183
Posted by Rich (Member # 112) on September 06, 2012, 11:02 AM:
I was certain that Obama was King of the liers, but then I listened to Bill Clinton's speech at the Democrap Convention. Old Bill is still the King of all Lier's. I guess he isn't as smart as I once thought. The big dummy is going down with the rest of us if Bam-Bam gets re-elected.
Posted by Possumal (Member # 823) on September 06, 2012, 12:27 PM:
Rich, since I didn't get to see the speech in question, could you give some examples of what Slick Willy lied about?
Posted by Rich (Member # 112) on September 06, 2012, 03:16 PM:
Well Possom, that sounds like a loaded question to me. I know that you like to hunt, and I know that you have Grandchildren to worry about, so I won't pass judgment right now.
Not being a spin Doctor, there is no way that I can explain everything Clinton said. Basically what he did was spin things around to make things look good for Obama and bad for Romney-Ryan. I don't believe there is any special money box in existence that is clearly marked "medicare", Social Security, Medicaid, or Obama care. For that reason, there is no way to prove that Obama gutted Medicare by stealing 716 billion dollars from that fund for purpose of funding Obama care. I know that he found a whole lot of money somewhere (tax payer's money" in order to get Obama care off to an expensive start. Anyway, Bill Clinton referred to that money as a "SAVINGS". Then he went on to say that the 716 Billion dollar figure was the exact same amount that was in the Romney-Ryan plan. In his clever little way, he spun things around to make it appear to the dim witted that it was Romney who was gutting Medicare, NOT Obama..You can find more of his spin Doctor baloney by doing a Google search of "Bill Clinton at the DNC.
Posted by Prune Picker (Member # 4107) on September 06, 2012, 03:50 PM:
"Savings" is the same word Carter used in 77-78 when he looted 250 BILLION $$$,$$$,$$$,$$$. from Medicare to cover the welfare deficit. He (Carter) even promised to pay it back, but that didn't happen.
Did Slick mention what the definition of IS, IS?
Posted by Jay Nistetter (Member # 140) on September 06, 2012, 03:53 PM:
He did not have sex with that woman, Monica Lewinski... BUT theirs is the party for women.
Sandra Flook was a DNC speaker whining about free birth control... BUT theirs is the party for women.
They touted Ted Kennedy... BUT theirs is the party for women.
He's a smooth talker and I can
not figure out why women think he's such a dandy.
Clinton said that the past administration destroyed the economy but faied to mention that the Democratic House and Democratic Senate were the ones in charge during the collapse.
Said that healthcare costs have only risen 4% during the last two years.... REALLY? Then I wish Buckwheat would explain why my premiums have doubled.
I only watched a few minutes of the speech and had to leave the room but YES!!! No doubt he told some whoppers.
Posted by Leonard (Member # 2) on September 06, 2012, 04:01 PM:
Well, in answer to the question; I remember that we always used to say, How do you know when Slick Willy is lying? When his lips move.
Good hunting. Lima Bravo
Posted by bucksnort (Member # 202) on September 06, 2012, 06:32 PM:
Jay, This is one woman who wouldn't give Bill the time of day. I've never liked him and always thought he was a true slime ball. How or why Hillery has put up with him for so long is beyond me. Of course, as Secretary of State she's always out of the country and doesn't have to look at him much less share living quarters. I did see on Fox & Friends this morning a clip of her smiling and watching Billy, via internet, give his speech.
Posted by Cdog911 (Member # 7) on September 06, 2012, 07:44 PM:
Willie has only one reason to see the Bamster get re-elected, If he does, he's a no-go due to term limits in four years which opens the door for Hitlery to hit the ground running. If Romney gets the nod, she has the very real threat of going nose to nose with a GOP President seeking his second term that turned the country around which means her ol' ass will be an also ran as well. '16 is it for her and Bill likes the perks of being First Ho.
Posted by Leonard (Member # 2) on September 06, 2012, 07:50 PM:
I'm watching dickweed give his speech and between throwing , gagging, and rolling my eyes, this asshole should burn in Hell. Nothing BUT LIES COMING OUT OF HIS FUCKING MOUTH.
But, look at the rapt attention. These people are on drugs! That Koolaid must be grape because it sure is working the magic.
But guess what? I do not think he has a chance. He's toast.
Good hunting. El Bee
Posted by Rich (Member # 112) on September 06, 2012, 08:44 PM:
I know what you mean Leonard. I have begun to believe that all Democraps are either liers, dim wits or both.
Posted by Possumal (Member # 823) on September 06, 2012, 09:25 PM:
Rich, I didn't mean it as a loaded question, but obviously a lot of the posters have some loaded answers (lol).
What about Independents? Are we all liars and fools and dimwitted?
Posted by Rich (Member # 112) on September 07, 2012, 05:30 AM:
Nothing wrong with most Independents Al. Just the liberal or queer one's. ![[Wink]](wink.gif)
Posted by Possumal (Member # 823) on September 07, 2012, 06:56 AM:
Well, I wasn't a queer last time I checked, and I damn sure am not an extreme left wing liberal, but I'm not an extreme right wing conservative either. Whatever it is that I am is moderate. Nobody from either side is going to piss in my ear and convince me it is raining.
I don't live and die by what Fox News puts out, what MSNBC puts out, or even what CNN puts out. I do put a lot of stock in what the non partisan Government Accounting Office puts out, especially if it is backed up by independent statistical experts. I'll put what they say ahead of what the Spin Doctors from either side say.
In my opinion, that is good policy for anyone to practice. Another good read is "Gardens of Democracy" by Nick Hanauer, a billionaire venture capitalist. He explains in layman terms how jobs are actually created and by whom. "The truth shall set you free" applies here for all mixed up people who don't know what to believe about trickle down economics and such.
Posted by Bofire (Member # 221) on September 07, 2012, 10:04 AM:
If G.W Bush ruined the economy and Obama is stuck with trying to fix it does that mean Clintons good economy was GHW Bush's fault?
Carl
Posted by Leonard (Member # 2) on September 07, 2012, 10:26 AM:
HERE'S BASIC POLITICS 101:
NEVER VOTE FOR ANY PARTY THAT WANTS TO IMPOSE "COMMON SENSE" GUN CONTROL.
This is a conviction that has worked for me since I first voted for Barry Goldwater. All the other shit falls in line behind a candidate that believes in the Second Amendment. Trust the Second Amendment, it will point you toward the candidate you can trust with your freedom.
And, go ahead and consider yourself "independent" while voting for the candidate that supports the Second Amendment, and guess what? Look back and you will never have voted for a friggin' Welfare Democrat, so quit kidding yourself. I might give Libertarians a pass but Independents that vote for the man are making a huge mistake to vote for ANY DEMOCRAT. They are not your friend.
Good hunting. El Bee
Posted by Rich (Member # 112) on September 07, 2012, 10:35 AM:
"Independents that vote for the man are making a huge mistake to vote for ANY DEMOCRAT. They are not your friend."
-------------------------------
THAT is what I now believe also. I didn't really believe it until the anti American named Obama came along, and I have watched the dreamy eyed followers drink his poison Kool aide.
Posted by Rich (Member # 112) on September 07, 2012, 05:29 PM:
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_9HbPL9CfuVc/SuIXSEzwU4I/AAAAAAAAA3c/nWLMlNksOBY/s400/download.htm
Posted by Possumal (Member # 823) on September 08, 2012, 03:46 AM:
Mighty fine attempt at the old bait and switch game, fellers, but it ain't gonna work on this ancient marsupial. I wouldn't get into a political "Discussion" on this forum for a one year long, expenses paid coyote hunting trip in spots of my choice, i.e. Montana. As always, believe who and what you choose, but I ain't playing that game. Voting is a precious privilege and right, and I don't share that stuff any more than I would share my wife.
Posted by Rich (Member # 112) on September 08, 2012, 06:21 AM:
Yes Al, you do have the right to vote for whoever you choose, but this time around every voter needs to vote for the Republican. Why? If the Democrat wins, America is doomed. Voting for a third party candidate is a vote thrown away.
Posted by Rich (Member # 112) on September 08, 2012, 06:37 AM:
Posted by Leonard (Member # 2) on September 08, 2012, 08:57 AM:
No problem, Al. I respect your choice.
My observation is that among sportsmen, in general, Conservatives outnumber Democrats by a factor of 99 to 1.
Grape Koolaid, YUM!
(just kidding)
Good hunting. Lima Bravo
Posted by Possumal (Member # 823) on September 08, 2012, 10:00 PM:
Leonard, point is you or nobody else knows my choice that I have a right to. I'm not worried about home made statistics either. Couldn't care less how others vote as it is their business. It wouldn't affect friendship I have with them if they vote for somebody other than my choice. I do respect your respect for my choice, whomever that turns out to be.
We're too busy killing coyotes, crows, and doves up here in Kaintucky to worry about much else. I haven't seen a t.v. show of any kind in over 6 weeks since going to work at Bud's Gun Warehouse & Shooting Range. Petal to the metal every day, leaving excess weight behind. Down from 226 to 207 and hopefully more to come. Feel so much better as far as conditioning for hunting.
Good hunting at ya!
Posted by Leonard (Member # 2) on September 09, 2012, 03:43 PM:
Here ya go, Al:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GNrAv6mfzic&feature=player_embedded
Posted by Possumal (Member # 823) on September 09, 2012, 09:26 PM:
I like Merle Haggard myself. Like Bob Seger a lot too. ![[Cool]](cool.gif)
Posted by Leonard (Member # 2) on September 09, 2012, 09:38 PM:
Nothing to worry about: President Obama is still calling for stricter gun control laws and a national ban on semi-automatic firearms in his 2012 party platform. None of which would prevent criminals from obtaining guns. All of which would disarm law-abiding Americans.
Good hunting. El Bee
UBB.classicTM
6.3.0