This is topic Puddinghead on gun control in forum Member forum at The New Huntmastersbbs!.
To visit this topic, use this URL:
https://www.huntmastersbbs.com/cgi-bin/cgi-ubb/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=6;t=003138
Posted by Leonard (Member # 2) on July 24, 2012, 01:01 PM:
Bloomberg: Maybe cops across the country should go on strike until tougher gun control laws are passed.
Yes, excellent idea. Except much of the rank and file support the Second Amendment. Better to do it now, with CCW support in most states.
What does that idiot expect? Maybe the bad guys will take the hint and run amuck with a crime spree? That is sure to help his cause. Then what? Would Bloomberg say; "see what happens when the police aren't there to protect you!
Except, THEY WERE THERE, AND THEY CAME UP 71 BODIES SHORT OF PROTECTING ANYBODY!
I wish that insect would keep his pie hole shut. He don't know shit. Had he not suggested it in the first place, he would be the first to scream loudest about the irresponsibility of law enforcement.
His idea makes no sense, at all. How in hell does this twerp keep getting elected? It says something about New Yawk. And Chicago. There's another evil twirp, Emanual.
Good hunting. Lima Bravo
Posted by Kokopelli (Member # 633) on July 24, 2012, 01:39 PM:
As I understand it, Auroa Col. passed a law some time ago banning concealed carry by permit holders.
Seems to me that all that did was to assure that the turd would have a large supply of unarmed targets.
Posted by Leonard (Member # 2) on July 24, 2012, 04:07 PM:
Really? Oh, that's perfect! I wondered when the police chief was expressing horror because the turd had bought 6,000 rounds. Like, what's the big deal about that? All the gun control assholes have been wringing their hands over all that firepower, and I highly resent these nincompoops calling that friggin' garden variety AR as an assault weapon.
The high capacity magazine fears just about drive me nuts. First of all, if it was a smart move, the military would be all over it. But, they're not. It's just extra weight, as far as I can tell, and the near assurance that it will jamb at some point.
But it's something this kid thought would be more bad ass and all the city folks wet their pants over 100 round magazines.
I even read something on CNN, (of course) where this woman said, that's not legitimate for hunting; THERE WOULDN"T BE ANY MEAT LEFT TO EAT! According to that logic, if you have 100 rounds, it stands to reason that you will be yanking the trigger until it's empty.
They really don't get it. And, I should be protecting these dumb ass people by risking my neck and shooting the turd? What for? Diane Feinstein said that if anybody was armed, there would be more people killed. And, this idiot is my Senator! I guess she just feels that it's better to all be killed by the high capacity magazine wielder than to risk shooting back and WHAT? Helping to kill the rest of the sheep? What kind of logic do these people use, anyway? Don't defend yourself because more people will be killed? She aught to be fired for that statement.
Good hunting. LB
Posted by Aznative (Member # 506) on July 26, 2012, 07:15 AM:
"Diane Feinstein said that if anybody was armed, there would be more people killed.". What a hypocrite. Feinstein has one of the very few California Carry permits. She was in the very early rampage that went on in the Gay Bay's Mayor's office back in the late 70s and she has taken the steps to protect herself.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moscone%E2%80%93Milk_assassinations
UBB.classicTM
6.3.0