|
Author
|
Topic: Wolf Reintroduction AZ & Utah Call To Action
|
CindyTraps
Knows what it's all about
Member # 1893
|
posted June 13, 2008 09:20 AM
To All: Yesterday in the Arizona Repulsive, they had an editorial dealing with wolf reintroduction. As you might suspect the slant, actually the whole article, was extremely supportive of the program. Since I have not seen any comments about this from sportsmen, I thought I would get this out to all of you.
You have until June 25th to get your comments in on proposed changes to wolf management procedures. I urge all of you to go to mexwolf@azgfd.gov and look at what is proposed. We need to make comments on this proposal, because you know the wolf advocates will.
Make no mistake, the wolf advocates are moving to expand the range of the Mexican Grey Wolf to include most of northern and central Arizona, as well as parts of Southern Utah. They believe we need to allow these alpha predators to move unfettered wherever they choose to go. This includes the Grand Canyon, even north of the canyon.
Once again it's up to you; you can sit on the sidelines and let someone else make this decision or you can be part of the process. They need to hear from individuals and organizations and here is you chance to be heard.
--------------------
Happy Trails
Posts: 113 | From: Seligman, Arizona | Registered: Oct 2007
| IP: Logged
|
|
CindyTraps
Knows what it's all about
Member # 1893
|
posted June 15, 2008 05:26 PM
Urgent Please Read Immediately!
BELOW, is a joint statement and request from the Arizona Deer Association and the Arizona Elk Society. Please read our concerns over the procedural changes being considered for implementation in the Mexican Gray Wolf recovery program. We have a short window to get our comments to the Arizona Game & Fish Department.
We need your comments sent to the AZGFD, Please do it now! They must be in by June 25th!
Arizona Elk, Deer and Wolves!
The wolf people, including groups like the Humane Society of the United States, PETA, the Sierra Club, and Defenders of Wildlife, want to do away with Elk and Deer hunting, want to expand the wolf population in Arizona to include all Elk and Deer habitat across the central part of the state as well as north of the Grand Canyon. The maps they are using overlay, almost perfectly, all the Elk and Deer habitat in the state. These groups will stop at nothing and have authored many articles without telling the whole story and consequences of expanding the wolf recovery range. Look how long it took Montana, Wyoming and Idaho to begin hunting wolves and now they are back in court spending millions of dollars fighting the wolf people that want the hunting to stop, even though, from the beginning it was always part of the recovery plan. We don’t need this in Arizona.
Please take a few minutes and protect our Elk and Deer hunting here in Arizona.
Send an email to mexwolf@azgfd.gov or mail it to Mexican Wolf Project, Attn: Terry Johnson, 5000 W. Carefree Highway, Phoenix, AZ. 85086.
We have until June 25th to comment.
Points to include in your comments:
• Sportsmen have paid to bring back wildlife, including elk and bighorn sheep to the State and want to maintain them.
• The current drought situation has kept our elk, deer and cattle herds low and in many cases dwindling and any expansion of the wolf population or wolf recovery area could decimate them.
• Protection of our hunting heritage is extremely important for the continuation of Arizona’s wildlife management programs.
• The current wolf program has failed to meet its objectives. To expand it will only compound the problem.
• I would not like to see any expansion of the current wolf population.
This statement below is being sent to all Arizona Sportsmen Conservation Organizations in an effort to get them to send comments to the Arizona Game & Fish Department by the June 25th comment period deadline.
Please read our comments and have your organizations consider sending additional comments to the department. As of now mainly the wolf advocates have chimed in. Their message is being carried by the Arizona Republic. This fact ought to both scare you and well as concern you!
Please respond by the June 25th deadline!
Please take a few minutes and protect our Elk, Deer, Antelope and Bighorn Sheep populations here in Arizona. Send an email to mexwolf@azgfd.gov or mail it to Mexican Wolf Project, Attn: Terry Johnson, 5000 W. Carefree Highway, Phoenix, AZ. 85086.
Below is a statement from the Arizona Deer Association and the Arizona Elk Society. This statement has been sent to the Arizona Game & Fish Department and will serve as our comments on the procedural changes being discussed for the Mexican Gray Wolf Recovery Program. We are asking all Arizona Sportsmen Conservation Organizations to send in comments to the AZGFD by the June 25th deadline. Please feel free to use any or all of our information in your statement to the AZGFD.
An Evaluation of Proposals to Expand the Mexican
Gray Wolf Recovery Area
Prior to European settlement of western North America, the Mexican wolf occupied much of the American Southwest, ranging as far south as perhaps central Mexico. This subspecies occupied most biotic communities with the exception of low deserts. The Mexican wolf’s diet consisted primarily of deer (both white-tailed and mule) and elk. With European settlement of northern Mexico and the American Southwest, domestic livestock including cattle and sheep were introduced and wolf depredation on these animals occurred. This in turn set up a conflict between livestock operators and wolves that lead to programs to eradicate the Mexican wolf, which was accomplished.
Two decades, the 1980s and 1990s were dedicated to the evaluation of the potential to recovery the Mexican wolf and to establish the most appropriate approach to Mexican wolf recovery. During this time, public involvement and agency coordination were extensive.
As a result of the nearly 20 years of discussions and scientific review relative to the best approach to take in recovering the Mexican wolf, the Blue Range Wolf Recovery Area (BRWRA) was established as the core of the recovery program. This decision was based on both societal and biological factors and was believed to be the best location to begin recovery efforts for this extirpated wildlife resource.
To date, the Mexican wolf recovery program has failed to achieve goals outlined in the 1996 Final EIS, and in fact, Mexican wolf population levels were reported to have declined in 2007 compared to reported data from 2006. Further, the population count as projected in the FEIS has failed to meet objectives in all but one year and the number of breeding pairs has never met the FEIS targets and in 2006, were less than 40% of the FEIS targets.
In reviewing the current status of the project, it is a poor plan to expand the wolf reestablishment area until greater success is achieved and targets outlined in the FEIS are met. Therefore, for the following reasons, we urge the Adaptive Management Oversight Committee and all of the cooperating agencies to stop consideration of reestablishment area expansion and focus on meeting the goals of the 1996 FEIS within the BAWRA, the site selected for the high likelihood of success.
• The Blue Range Wolf Recovery Area was selected in part due to the relatively low human activity and residence in the area and hence, reduced likelihood of human-wolf conflict. Recreational use of the area being considered for recovery area expansion is among the highest in Arizona, which will lead to a high rate of conflicts and likely higher wolf mortality or removal; a factor that could reduce public support of the effort in the BRWRA.
• Lead agencies indicate that adequate funding is needed to carry out the reestablishment project in BAWRA. Greatly expanding the wolf recovery area to include areas of the Mogollon Rim and Coconino National Forest would dilute available funds, that to date have been limited. This will reduce the likelihood of obtaining the population goals outlined in the 1996 Final Environmental Impact Statement.
• Dietary studies have documented that Mexican wolves prey heavily on native ungulates, including elk, mule and white-tailed deer, and potentially bighorn sheep and pronghorn, and that their diet does contain domestic livestock as well. Livestock production is a common practice in the area being evaluated for recovery area expansion and it is likely that introducing wolves into this area would heighten conflict between legally-permitted livestock use and wolf reestablishment efforts. This has a high potential to cause eroded support for the reestablishment program in BAWRA, an unfortunate outcome.
• Published data from Mexican wolf diet studies indicate that nearly 90% of the diet of this subspecies consists of native ungulates, primarily elk. It is important to note that both wildlife viewing and big game hunting are important economic factors in the Mogollon Rim/Coconino National Forest area and any conservation program that would have the end result of reduced native wildlife densities would be viewed negatively by the conservation community, which could erode support for the BAWRA program.
In summary, the Mexican wolf recovery effort has had very limited success and expanding efforts to other areas before meeting projected targets in the 1996 FEIS will have adverse societal and biological ramifications. Until greater success is obtained in the recovery program, all efforts should focus on the Blue Area, the area selected after 2 decades of study. To do otherwise is both fiscally and biologically irresponsible for all cooperating agencies.
Please take a few minutes and protect our Elk, Deer, Antelope and Bighorn Sheep populations here in Arizona.
Send an email to mexwolf@azgfd.gov or mail it to Mexican Wolf Project, Attn: Terry Johnson, 5000 W. Carefree Highway, Phoenix, AZ. 85086.
--------------------
Happy Trails
Posts: 113 | From: Seligman, Arizona | Registered: Oct 2007
| IP: Logged
|
|
yuccabush
Knows what it's all about
Member # 582
|
posted June 16, 2008 05:16 PM
They just showed a poll on my local Albuquerque news channel. They said 69% of New Mexicans and 78% of Arizonians approve of the wolf reintroduction. Animal rights groups conducted this poll.
Posts: 67 | From: Bernalillo | Registered: Feb 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
CindyTraps
Knows what it's all about
Member # 1893
|
posted June 17, 2008 09:49 AM
Such BS all the more reason sportsman need to respond to it.
--------------------
Happy Trails
Posts: 113 | From: Seligman, Arizona | Registered: Oct 2007
| IP: Logged
|
|
TA17Rem
Hello, I'm the legendary Tim Anderson, Southern Minneesota Know it all
Member # 794
|
posted June 17, 2008 06:35 PM
I happen to like wolves and think every state should have some. We have them up here in Mn. , no big deal, and maybe in a couple of years they will have a season on them..
On another note i see idaho is going to have a wolf season, need to thin them out cause they are hard on the Elk. Also noticed they increased the number of Elk lic. for this year...Something ain't right!!!
--------------------
What if I told you, the left wing and right wing both belong to same bird!
Posts: 5709 | From: S.D. | Registered: Jan 2006
| IP: Logged
|
|
yuccabush
Knows what it's all about
Member # 582
|
posted June 17, 2008 08:34 PM
TA the only problem is the wolves they are releasing here are not full blood mexican grey wolfs. The only way they can fend for themselves is trough livestock predation or if one of the friends of the wolves feeds it with some roadkill.
They have already wasted MILLIONS of dollars on this scam. Enough is enough.
Posts: 67 | From: Bernalillo | Registered: Feb 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
Printer-friendly view of this topic
