This is topic New Arizona Gun Law in forum Member forum at The New Huntmastersbbs!.


To visit this topic, use this URL:
https://www.huntmastersbbs.com/cgi-bin/cgi-ubb/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=6;t=002353

Posted by Briguy (Member # 3471) on April 16, 2010, 09:08 PM:
 
Signed today and will go into effect in about 90 days...

http://www.azcentral.com/news/election/azelections/articles/2010/04/16/20100416arizona-concealed-weapons-bill16-ON.html

What's everyone's thoughts? I'm seeing different responses even from the enthusiasts.
 
Posted by Andy L (Member # 642) on April 17, 2010, 04:59 AM:
 
Whats not to like? Its the constitution. If you can legally own the gun, you can legally carry it. I dont like the part that you cant carry in a bar and grill without a permit. Makes no sense. The only thing that does make sense is having a permit to carry in other states.

Along those lines, the federal cocealed carry they tried to pass last year was bullshit. That was a backdoor attempt for progressives to claim the 10th ammendment did allow for fed to take over states rights. If that had passed, since they could loosen gun rights without the states permission, they could also tighten them, which is no doubt the plan.

I wish every state would follow AZs lead on this. I expect other states that have great gun laws like MO, OK, MT and a few others to follow soon.

So what are you hearing bad, from anyone who is pro gun? AZ just loosened its laws and took a step back toward the constitution. Nothing bad about that.

Edit: In MO, business's have an option to put a no gun sign on their door. If you get caught carrying in there, and dont leave when asked, you can get a hundred dollar ticket. I normall use the concealed means concealed state of mind. Along with I would rather be judged by 12 than carried by 6. So, I normally ignore the signs and go about my business. Not to mention Im normally nervous about leaving my gun in the car.

But this goes two ways. If I see a sign on a door, I also have a choice to not go in and spend my money else where. Yesterday was a good example. I have been lookin for a new truck. I stopped at a dealership and found one that I wanted. Salesman came out and shot me a good price. We started to go in and there was the sign. I asked about it and he said the owner didnt like guns and was afraid of a shooting. I told him that the folks that would shoot him wouldnt pay attention to the sign anyway and told him to tell his boss that the sign just lost a sale cause I had my gun on me and I wasnt wanted inside.

He was pretty pissed. However, I have done this several times and most times the sign isnt there next time. It worked on my bank and local grocery store.

[ April 17, 2010, 05:09 AM: Message edited by: Andy L ]
 
Posted by bucksnort (Member # 202) on April 17, 2010, 05:37 AM:
 
Here's an article on the front page of today's Arizona Daily Star -- Tucson newspaper

http://azstarnet.com/news/local/govt-and-politics/article_20db5fcc-8c25-50d9-beaf-dbe131fe0e3f.html
 
Posted by Andy L (Member # 642) on April 17, 2010, 05:48 AM:
 
If someone carries without knowledge of how to use the gun or when to use the gun, that falls back on personal responsibility and there is a remedy already in place. Its called unlawful use of a weapon here in MO. Its a felony and that will take care of that person ever buying or carrying a gun again. Everyone should take responsibility for their own actions. That includes being sure that you know the law and you know how to carry and handle a gun, if you are going to carry one. No government intervention is needed. Just another case of big brother telling you what is best for you.
 
Posted by 4949shooter (Member # 3530) on April 17, 2010, 07:13 AM:
 
Some carry enthusiasts are saying they feel a carry permit is better because it forces people to attend a firearms safety course.

Though I must say, this is a positive step for any second amendment advocate.
 
Posted by Briguy (Member # 3471) on April 17, 2010, 08:52 AM:
 
Andy - I'm hearing a couple of things. First one has been mentioned, and that is the knowledge factor. In some circles there is concern that people won't know how to properly use their gun, or when the rules of engagement allow the use of deadly force. Personally, you should understand these things if you are carrying concealed or open, so I don't see where it changes things that much.

Second thing is the economic impact, but on that one I think you will see a self correction as crime rates drop. The thing that will hurt some folks immediately is the guys augmenting their income by providing the training. I got a buddy that just went through a bunch of classes and such to get certified to do that. Unless trainers are very specalized in what they are doing there, I think most of them will just sort of go away...
 
Posted by CrossJ (Member # 884) on April 17, 2010, 09:20 AM:
 
quote:
Some carry enthusiasts are saying they feel a carry permit is better because it forces people to attend a firearms safety course.

I understand that thought process, BUT, the 8 hour course I took to get my CCL was not a course on firearm safety or self defence. The instructer did cover 'range' safety issues, and how he wanted the handguns handled on the range...but that was it. It was some good insight into laws regarding CC in OK and other states. But truthfully, it was all a rough over draft, leaving the responsibility of the liscence holder to research and know the laws.

I think a small percentage of CCL holders are actually very proficient with their firearm. My guess is alot of them don't practice with them but maybe once a year, if that.

That said, I agree with Andy. If an individual can legally own a firearm, screw the CCL. They don't need my finger prints on file. I think the AZ law is a step in the right direction.

Maintain
 
Posted by Leonard (Member # 2) on April 17, 2010, 10:30 AM:
 
To tell you the truth, I think a few things about that law are a little questionable, but nothing that cannot be sorted out, point by point and I'm sure there will be lots of "anti's" willing to offer a restriction, or two?

The thing that bothers me the most is the signs outside businesses. Forcing you to turn around and ditch your piece under the seat of the truck is just asking for a smash and grab. It seems to me that these places, open to the public, should allow legal carry, and welcome those that do. Surveys have shown that these are not the bad guys and need not be feared. One guy with a handgun could have stopped a lot of killing at VA Tech. But, the idiots proudly proclaim a gun free campus! IDIOTS!

Good hunting. LB

[ April 17, 2010, 10:30 AM: Message edited by: Leonard ]
 
Posted by Az-Hunter (Member # 17) on April 17, 2010, 10:45 AM:
 
I have always considered those signs to represent store policy, not law, so hell, it's concealed, who knows but me?
I just go on in, and pay no attention to the gawd damned signs, in fact, that old song starts playin' in my head when I read those...." sign, sign, everywhere a sign". I figure the bill of rights trumps a sign?
 
Posted by Dave Allen (Member # 3102) on April 17, 2010, 11:01 AM:
 
Yeah thats like the "drug free zone" signs at the school's, I guess some of those kids cant read ?
because they're buying and selling in the hallways everyday [Mad]
 
Posted by Leonard (Member # 2) on April 17, 2010, 11:01 AM:
 
I carry a purse. One time, following my wife into the theater and handing the tickets, the guy said he needed to look in my bag. I refused, asking him why he didn't demand to look in my wife's purse? He took me a step up in rank and although she was clearly pissed off at me, said: "enjoy the movie". Anymore, I just say that it's for my medications rather than my secret weapon holster.

Good hunting. LB
 
Posted by Nikonut (Member # 188) on April 17, 2010, 11:08 AM:
 
quote:
Anymore, I just say that it's for my medications rather than my secret weapon holster
Good one Leonard!

Just tell them it's your "catheter" bag and they won't even want to look!

Nikonut [Big Grin]
 
Posted by Kelly Jackson (Member # 977) on April 17, 2010, 11:13 AM:
 
LB - never figured you for a purse kinda guy.
 
Posted by TOM64 (Member # 561) on April 17, 2010, 11:52 AM:
 
I never seen any such sign. Honest officer...

Elbee, a purse/murse?
 
Posted by Aznative (Member # 506) on April 17, 2010, 12:16 PM:
 
The CCW classes are very worth while. My instructor did cover when you can and when you shouldn't use deadly force. He also advised us to lawyer up if the worst happens. The nice thing for my situation is I don't have to worry about a family member using my truck with my carry piece in it. The general carry law simply said it had to be in a holster with a strap. The idea was the time it took to unstrap the weapon would give a LEO an edge. My carry holster has a velcro pull thru strap so it is immediately available. It was real questionable if it would qualify and that would be primarily the officer’s interpretation of the law.

Leonard, I've carried in Ca before. Even went to Disneyland with my piece in the camera bag before 9-11. I left my piece in the car last time I went to the Enchanted Kingdom because of concern of increased security measures that have been implemented there. I still go with a lot of fire power with high cap mags and such. I don't want to ever be there weaponless if the big one hits. In fact I don't want to be there period if the big one happens. The aftermath will make the Rodney King riots look like a K-8 play ground. My grandson (13) thinks I'm a little odd and jokes about it. I don't want to even mention what I bring over to your home state, but at least I don’t leave it hot.
 
Posted by Leonard (Member # 2) on April 17, 2010, 12:42 PM:
 
Kelly, did you ever notice how we dress in the summertime, here in The Land of The Fruits and The Nuts? Bermudas, flipflops and a wife beater shirt. Where else are you going to conceal, up your ass?

I'm on my third purse, each a little more manly. lol

Good hunting. LB
 
Posted by 4949shooter (Member # 3530) on April 17, 2010, 02:01 PM:
 
I wore a Desantis Gunnysack for over 18 years. It was (and still is) a good way to carry a weapon and identification.

I eventually purchased a more concealable weapon, and did away with the Gunnysack for everyday carry. I still wear it while I am hunting though, or wearing shorts and a wifebeater.
 
Posted by TOM64 (Member # 561) on April 17, 2010, 02:06 PM:
 
"Where else are you going to conceal, up your ass?"

Close Elbee, the small of your back IWB holster and you don't have to look like a queer or you're carrying. [Big Grin]

[ April 17, 2010, 02:07 PM: Message edited by: TOM64 ]
 
Posted by Cdog911 (Member # 7) on April 17, 2010, 05:06 PM:
 
As soon as Kansas approved concealed carry, every business in the state started posting the "no guns" signs. An interesting point was made shortly thereafter about how the supposed act of allowing us to carry concealed inadvertently restricted us even more. After all, before CCW, Kansas was cool with open carry and you could go just about anywhere. Nowadays, "no guns" means no guns, concealed, open up your ass, wherever.

A buddy of mine even pulled into a convenience store this winter while hunting. Had his .22 pistol on his hip. Had taken out the revolver and left it in the truck since the place had one of those signs on the door, and an LEO confronted him as he approached the business accusing him of trying to violate the store policy and the law. This guy is Army and he pretty much burned the idiot cop by pointing out 1) he was still in the parking lot where guns are legal, and 2) his life threatening holster was EMPTY.

They could bust me daily, I guess. If I'm hunting, I always have a .22 revolver on my belt. Unfortunately, my belt is under fleece overalls and two jackets and I don't even think of it being there. I guess I could always offer up the defense that they need probable cause to stop me and search my person.

As far as those signs, Kansas went smoke free recently - all businesses except, ironically, state-owned casinos. Anyway, so-called public buildings which are really private businesses which rely upon the public to stay that way don't have a choice. I told my legislator recently that they really screwed the pooch on that one. Abilene was the first in the state to go smoke free, so this was an idea I'd had for some time. Could do the same thing with guns.

I told him that the law should have been that each and every business must display on every point of entry one of two signs - either a cigarette icon to show that smoking is allowed, or the same icon with the diagonal line through it to show that smoking is prohibited. You could just as easily replace smoking with gun.

Anyway, the beauty of this is that the entire system is based upon choice - choice by the business owner, choice by the customer. The business owner can allow smoking/ guns if he wants. The customer has the opportunity at the door to decide if he/ she wants to enter a business that allows smoking/ guns.

The problem with these issues is illustrated in an incident that happened at the restaurant where my wife works. No smoking, but the new e-cigarettes are allowed because they do not produce smoke. My wife has changed to them and it is helping her a lot. Anyway, some lady recently started lobbying to outlaw their use in public buildings as well, even though they pose no risk or threat to bystanders at all, simply because they are a replacement for the real deal. This woman has outed their movement by showing that the goal is not public health, but rather, control of the public. Therefore, Geordie, when you get up there on your water tower with your guns, make sure you have some smokes, too, to make sure you piss off everyone equally.

[ April 17, 2010, 05:08 PM: Message edited by: Cdog911 ]
 
Posted by Andy L (Member # 642) on April 17, 2010, 05:30 PM:
 
Lance, if I remember correctly, your no gun signs are different from ours. Here, like I said, if your caught, you will be asked to leave. If you dont, the cops can give you a $100 ticket.

In KS, I believe, its a felony to carry past a sign? Is that right?
 
Posted by Andy L (Member # 642) on April 17, 2010, 05:33 PM:
 
One thing on the no gun sign thing. Im not against it. A person that owns a business should have the right to refuse service to anyone. If they dont want guns in their store, unless its just somewhere I have to go, I oblige them and spend my money elsewhere. Like I said, I try to make sure they are aware of losing sales. Most times with some reasoning, you can get the signs to come down.

Missouri Carry website even has business cards you can get to hand out to people with the gun free zones. It basically has a picture of a gun with a slash through it, an equal sign and a picture of cash with a slash through it. No guns=no money.
 
Posted by Cdog911 (Member # 7) on April 17, 2010, 08:54 PM:
 
I honestly don't know, Andy. I'll have to ask around.
 
Posted by Kokopelli (Member # 633) on April 18, 2010, 05:08 AM:
 
Living here in the Land of Cactus & Coyotes, I've gotten quite a few emails on this. Hoorahs & envey for the most part. Then, yesterday while pondering the perfection of the sunset in the west, the mint julep in my hand, & Sylvia's cover of Drifter, I got to thinking; How far has the country degraded that where the RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED......we need to pass a stunning law (Film at 11:00) making it LEGAL to carry a gun???

The next thing that you know, we'll bravely make it illegal for someone to be in this country illegally................... [Eek!]
 
Posted by Leonard (Member # 2) on April 18, 2010, 07:49 AM:
 
That's sorta profound, koko. I'm impressed.
 




Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.0