This is topic Kavanaugh issues in forum Member forum at The New Huntmastersbbs!.


To visit this topic, use this URL:
https://www.huntmastersbbs.com/cgi-bin/cgi-ubb/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=6;t=004951

Posted by Leonard (Member # 2) on September 17, 2018, 03:58 PM:
 
Look, I can be as partisan as any Liberal alive. I just think Republicans should go after this woman and trash her just like Hillary trashed the women that exposed what Bill Clinton, did and is still doing.

The Republicans are at a disadvantage, they don't know how to fight dirty like Democrats. Democrats think anything is fair. Like Harry Reid said when he was asked why he spread all those lies about Romney not paying taxes for ten years: "He didn't win, did he?" No shame whatsoever!

Go after this radical liberal college professor. Show where she's a whore and cheats on her taxes. Afterwards, if asked say: SHE DIDN'T WIN, DID SHE?"

Anyway, read about it here:

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2018/09/professor_accusing_kavanaugh_is_radical_sjw_with_some_damning_student_reviews.html
 
Posted by Kokopelli (Member # 633) on September 17, 2018, 05:03 PM:
 
A 15 year old girl, at a party where guys are drinking, goes into a bedroom with 2 of the guys instead of out the front door.
Sure.
No doubt she was just there to pass out some WatchTower pamplets.
 
Posted by Lone Howl (Member # 29) on September 17, 2018, 05:35 PM:
 
Yeah, where were her parents? Maybe they should have their asses beat?
Mark
 
Posted by Leonard (Member # 2) on September 17, 2018, 08:45 PM:
 
The fucking Liberals want to throw out statute of limitations on everything, allow felons to vote, illegal wetbacks to vote. But here we are, some 15 year old girl gets felt up at a party and they are ready to lynch this guy!

What was the excuse about Clinton with his cigar? Oh yeah:

quote:
[B]It's just sex]/B]
But, in this case 36 years ago, she never even got her clothes off?

Anybody see a double standard?

Good hunting. El Bee

PS Gulp! I will never be confirmed for the Supremes. I'm shocked!
SHOCKED!

[ September 17, 2018, 08:47 PM: Message edited by: Leonard ]
 
Posted by Leonard (Member # 2) on September 17, 2018, 08:56 PM:
 
By the way, in high school, I ran with a bunch of guy that went to a private boys school, a few of them, in fact. Loyola and John Bosco and Bishop Amat. We knew a bunch of girls from Ramona Convent and St Lucy's. Good stuff! The Catholic girls were considered a little wild compared to public schools.

Anyway, that's why he can know 65 girls from other schools. There is a bunch of interaction between all girl and all boy schools.

Good hunting. El Bee
 
Posted by Paul Melching (Member # 885) on September 18, 2018, 05:03 AM:
 
Loved my Catholic girls the Jewish ones just laid there ! oh I'm goin to hell for that !
 
Posted by Dave Allen (Member # 3102) on September 18, 2018, 06:50 AM:
 
PANIC IN DC
D's offering to [KILL] sexual assault allegation v Judge K in exchange for immediate pullback of DECLAS.
POTUS: Judge K will be confirmed regardless…
Q
 
Posted by Kokopelli (Member # 633) on September 18, 2018, 07:57 AM:
 
So the Dems present an unproven and probably untrue allegation from three and a half decades ago about a couple of teenagers and now want to use it as a bargaining chip ????

It must really suck to have no honor what-so-ever !!!!
 
Posted by knockemdown (Member # 3588) on September 18, 2018, 10:53 AM:
 
The judge K stuff is a feeble attempt to shift the news cycle away from the fact that our Prez just ordered declas of material that will PROVE FISA abuse, therefore rendering the mueller 'witch hunt' a sham...
Oh, and all the text messages between the bad actors will further prove that same point!

Wonderful show some of us are watching unfold! Just hope those who aren't paying as close attention will catch the drift, once this stuff comes out. Lordy knows, the fakestream media is not gonna voluntarily implicate itself in the greatest betrayal of our Republic, since....ever!
 
Posted by Paul Melching (Member # 885) on September 18, 2018, 11:36 AM:
 
Spot on
Fred !
 
Posted by Dave Allen (Member # 3102) on September 18, 2018, 01:54 PM:
 
This broad is nuts, course we all knew that.

PANIC ?
https://archive.fo/20180918164000/https://twitter.com/HillaryClinton/status/1042067964403572736
 
Posted by Kokopelli (Member # 633) on September 18, 2018, 05:45 PM:
 
Has anybody noticed that whatever the hildabeast is bitching about the most is generally exactly what she is the most guilty of ????
Corruption ???? She's the poster child for corruption !!!!!
 
Posted by Leonard (Member # 2) on September 19, 2018, 07:11 AM:
 
I think it is remarkable that so much is made of every little foible by Republicans and yet, the Bitch gets away with virtual murder? WTF? She is an evil cunt. She needs to keep her mouth shut because there is still a lot of provable deeds that she can be held accountable for. Yet, she is so damned smug. She really thinks the world adores her, but we sure as hell dodged the bullet by electing Trump instead of that bitch. I don't get it! What the hell makes her so admirable?

Good hunting. El Bee
 
Posted by Semp (Member # 3074) on September 19, 2018, 08:11 AM:
 
What do the Dems think will happen after K gets confirmed to SCOTUS? That, hopefully, he will just forgive and forget the hosing they tried to give him?

Fat chance.
 
Posted by Lone Howl (Member # 29) on September 19, 2018, 09:06 AM:
 
Trump shouldve put up one of the 2 women for scotus instead...but yeah this is weak...as long as Republicans sack up and dont let themselves get rolled..again.
Mark
 
Posted by Dave Allen (Member # 3102) on September 19, 2018, 10:14 AM:
 
https://imgoat.com/uploads/ef605fc8db/149494.jpg
 
Posted by knockemdown (Member # 3588) on September 19, 2018, 03:56 PM:
 
Dave hit the image linky button below, and copypasta that link into the box that shows up.
just be sure to erase the initial http in the box, so it's not doubling up the linky address...

 -

[ September 19, 2018, 03:59 PM: Message edited by: knockemdown ]
 
Posted by Leonard (Member # 2) on September 19, 2018, 06:36 PM:
 
Where it is usual that an ex girlfriend might jump at the chance to trash her old boyfriend; in this case two women claim Kavanaugh was a perfect gentleman.

Yet, the Media has made up their mind, HANG THE SCHMUCK!

https://freebeacon.com/politics/two-kavanaughs-ex-girlfriends-defend-character/
 
Posted by Leonard (Member # 2) on September 22, 2018, 03:13 PM:
 
This article tells me the woman isn't playing with a full deck. 36 years after being groped by somebody, and she believes it to be Kavanaugh? But, she is worried about her safety while testifying, the guy can't be in the same room?

And now, if he's appointed, she will leave the country? The more I read, the more demands she makes, the more I think this woman is not rational, yet every Democrat in town thinks she should be believed, just because?

This is looking more like a lynching all the time.

https://dailycaller.com/2018/09/22/kavanaugh-accuser-considers-fleeing-us/

[ September 22, 2018, 03:13 PM: Message edited by: Leonard ]
 
Posted by Kokopelli (Member # 633) on September 22, 2018, 04:00 PM:
 
Maybe she could get a group discount ticket with Rosie & Whoopie & Baldwin and all of those other pukes that threatened to move to Canada if Donald Trump got elected.

Generous offer; I will be happy to donate all proceeds from the pending sale of my Rigor Rabbit decoy on the camping trip toward their ticket(s).
 
Posted by Paul Melching (Member # 885) on September 22, 2018, 05:56 PM:
 
Why have not started the purge? These morons are completely nuts and unproductive. I say we start with the complicit media they want socialism so badly round em up and send them to the socialist country of their choosing !
 
Posted by Leonard (Member # 2) on September 22, 2018, 07:37 PM:
 
Republicans got no balls! They are being pushed around like grade schoolers. They gave in on Thursday and they have not said if they gave away the store on all the other unreasonable issues. I'm disgusted.

Good hunting. El Bee
 
Posted by knockemdown (Member # 3588) on September 23, 2018, 05:25 AM:
 
This goes both ways...
Unfortunately, the confirmation process has been delayed. But, it's becoming all the more clear, even to average Joe & Mary clueless idiot, that this has been a sham...

Desperate obstructionists have precious few cards left to play! Just think....if THIS is all they got, I ain't no worried! Their only shot is to,'win' in the court of public opinion, and even that is blowing back in their faces!

We just learn that this lyin' pawn submitted that there were THREE other people at this "party". But, lookeee here! All THREE of those 'eyewitnesses' submit statements/testimony that completely counter to the pawn's allegations...

For anyone keeping score, that's ONE accuser, who's NOT submitted ANY "official" charges, against FOUR witnesses who've submitted statements (under penalty of perjury) that deny witnessing, or even being present during this "party". Ie, IT NEVER HAPPENED!!!

Remember, you're watching a show! Allowing these obstructionistis to literally self destruct themselves, is the only way to 'wake people up' from believeing what MSM is ramming down their throats. It's only a matter of time, before the court of public opinion is rendered impotent. And, when that finally happens, they'll be out of cards, completely...

Remember the story of the boy who cried "wolf"??? Apparently, these fools forgot it...

[ September 23, 2018, 05:29 AM: Message edited by: knockemdown ]
 
Posted by Kokopelli (Member # 633) on September 23, 2018, 07:29 AM:
 
Hmmmmmm…………………………
Doing math on fingers & toes, but it seems that Bret Kavanaugh has more women defending him than Bill Clinton had accusing him.
No hypocrisy here folks. Nothing to see. Move along now.
 
Posted by Leonard (Member # 2) on September 24, 2018, 04:07 AM:
 
The statements I have seen from Democrat Senators makes me wonder how they ever qualified and were elected to office? There are three or four that have no idea about the rules that govern charges and accusations and witnesses. This is exactly the communist/socialist playbook. A version of:

WHEN DID YOU STOP BEATING YOUR WIFE?

Loaded questions. Twisted responses, backwards format. He must be guilty; he's a man, ain't he? This is the LBG (whatever it's called)? Man hating Lesbians. Just look at this "chick" lawyer representing Ford. Does she look like a muff diver, or what? She's a Dyke, a man hater. I'd hate to face her in a dark alley. It hurts to look at her! I want naked pictures! BARF!

They are all jumping on Kavanaugh for stuff that supposedly happened 36 years ago. And this is in spite of the latest Liberal scheme about how young minds are underdeveloped and they don't know right from wrong until they are about 26 or so? Double standards! Crazy makers!

Somebody has to shake some sense into this fiasco. Otherwise, let's just ask Schumer who he wants on the Supreme Court? They act like they won the election, fer kripe sakes!

Good hunting. El Bee
GO DODGERS!

[ September 24, 2018, 04:09 AM: Message edited by: Leonard ]
 
Posted by Leonard (Member # 2) on September 24, 2018, 10:50 AM:
 
I heard there is an ad on Craig's list. "Will make 6 car payments for any female willing to claim Bret Kavanaugh touched them inappropriately." First 100 responses only!

Good hunting. El Bee

PS just kidding, but hey! Could be?
 
Posted by Paul Melching (Member # 885) on September 25, 2018, 03:13 AM:
 
Bout right for Soros !
 
Posted by Cdog911 (Member # 7) on September 25, 2018, 02:59 PM:
 
I have to give credit to Q for making the most succinct summation of this entire shit show last night when he won the internet for the day with a post that basically said (with a little editorial license on my part),

This isn't about rape. And it isn't about sexual assault. This is all about Roe v. Wade. It's about power. And it's about just how far those sick fucks will go to protect and preserve their right to kill babies.

(Mic drop)
 
Posted by Leonard (Member # 2) on September 25, 2018, 04:47 PM:
 
Lance, as they say, you are talking to the choir here. I assume everybody knows what’s at stake and who is completely out of line with their behavior. Liberals are scared to death that a bonehead decision 45 years ago is at risk. It’s called Roe vs Wade, and it created a constitutional right to abortion and in the view of radicals like HRC, they think the unborn can be killed right up to term, even the gruesome “partial birth abortion”.

Good hunting. El Bee
 
Posted by Leonard (Member # 2) on September 26, 2018, 10:24 AM:
 
If I ever thought that Liberals had a mental illness, as I have stated on many occasions, the testimonials on behalf of Professor Ford, without a shred of evidence is proof positive.

How can all these supposedly intelligent people stick their necks out and proclaim that they believe her story from 36 years ago, when all we have is a fuzzy photo with the wraparound shades, and a written statement from her radical feminist lawyer.

I guess they take these things on blind faith alone? There is NOTHING to substantiate the claims, nobody has interviewed her, seems like she's hiding out somewhere? The Dems make clear that she is petrified of something? Apparently she thinks conservatives will bomb her house or something? Hello? Conservatives don't do these things, Liberals do these things!

But, my amazement is that so many people make fools of themselves, (especially female Senators) by strongly backing her claims....based on nothing! Even the Head Inquisitor, Feinstein has said she doesn't know? She started the whole thing, she has the original documents and she doesn't know? But, the rest of them, from Hawaii and New York, they are positive! And, based on what? Because she's a woman. Apparently, women never lie?

I seem to remember a case of rape where a man had been in prison for 10 or 20 years and the female finally came out and said it was all a big lie. And, since she was positive he did it, he was convicted on her testimony alone. So long in prison because a woman lied about a rape! Yet, we are told that women must be believed. Whatabout Those Duke Lacrosse players? No rape, the stripper lied? Need I go on?

But, in this case, we are supposed to believe her without any evidence. And, how could there be any evidence? It's a "He said, She said" case all the way. These people are crazy to think that flimsy charges like that could send a man to prison. Oh, but wait a minute, they claim it's not criminal, he won't go to jail, he just won't get a lifetime appointment. Yeah sure, and he and his whole family will have to live with the shame for the rest of his life.

Democrats play for keeps, that is for sure. They are willing to do whatever it takes to stop this appointment, no matter the shady dirty tricks they use to do it.

I'm disgusted!

Good hunting. El Bee
 
Posted by Cdog911 (Member # 7) on September 26, 2018, 05:56 PM:
 
Here's my take on what's happened with Ford. Pure speculation.

Something happened to her. I don't doubt that. I cannot think of anyone in their right mind (including libs) making claims as she has that she knew would draw fire upon herself. But, her claims were in a personal correspondence to her Representative who then passed her letter along to the beloved DiFi. At this point, all Ford had done was make a personal observation which, in the worst of times, might have triggered a civil action but, for all intents and purposes, was a "no harm, no foul" situation.

What she didn't foresee was DiFi weaponizing her
letter by entering it into the public record in, of all places, the United States Senate. Now, this poor woman finds herself having to defend what she may have intended to be a personal conversation in front of Congress and under oath. All of a sudden, the minor civil issue becomes a real shit show as she's unable to produce actual proof which makes her looking at federal felony charges for perjuring herself before the Senate should she go forward. If she doesn't, she looks like she's lying, which most folks already think she is. DiFI really, really, REALLY fucked this woman over big time.

So, why do others come forward? To try and get Kavanaugh to withdraw his nomination because if he does that, this woman's ass is out of a sling and whether or not she's being truthful becomes irrelevant.

I've been in a lot of talks about this recently. Over 200 people have come forward who have known BK for decades and vouched for his character. Makes me recall back to when we were planning our 20th high school reunion. I was tasked with the job of locating a half-dozen classmates whose whereabouts were unknown. A person gets nervous about facing his/her classmates whom they haven't seen in 20 years. How will you stack up? I've got a former bestie who is now a VP at Bombardier Learjet. Another owns and runs her own anesthesiology practice with a dozen+ other MD's working for her. Yet, what I found was that when I finally got hold of them, the person with whom I was speaking and visiting with on the phone sounded like, acted like, and reacted like the same person I knew in high school. Moral of the story? People don't change. Despite the time, we immediately recognized one another's voices on the phone. They still had the same sense of humor and the same basic core value sets that they had when young. The only thing that had changed was their address, their title, and their age. Therefore, I hold the opinions of those who actually knew BK as the gospel truth.

I was initially surprised that Trump didn't rip this woman from stem to stern in tweets. His playing nice-nice with them made me look for a reason for his shocking behavior, and I think they know she's lying and have the proof so that, once she's sworn in and gives false testimony, they're going to nuke her. I would love nothing more than to see her frog march out of the Senate chambers to face federal perjury charges, with more to follow.

DiFi used this poor woman as a means to an end and the end is becoming clearer and clearer to the American people. I foresee a huge win in November for the GOP and I think Trump would become the greatest President in history if he was to go after those democrats for sedition and start arresting anyone linked to the so-called Deep State. Heads should roll and I think the American people would keep the blades sharpened.
 
Posted by Leonard (Member # 2) on September 26, 2018, 07:09 PM:
 
Sounds wonderful, Lance. I'd like to see all of it happen, but I'm not expecting too much more than she nervous and he indignant and everybody already has their mind made up anyway, so who the hell knows?

Good hunting. El Bee
 
Posted by Leonard (Member # 2) on September 27, 2018, 08:47 AM:
 
I have been watching this sham testimony this morning.

The Republican interviewer is getting nowhere.

However, the accuser has been thanked for her courage 10,063 times thus far. General thank you's by the Democrats an additional 1,000 times and they just broke for lunch, otherwise another 500 "thank you's" will have to wait until they return, and I can't wait for that.

My impression, at this point is that Kavanaugh doesn't have a prayer. One can only hope.

Good hunting. El Bee

edit: apparently? there have been two men that have claimed that it was they, not Kavanaugh, that attacked Ford. I believe these "confessions" are just as credible as the claims of the three women so far, but I could be mistaken?

edit: I should mention that as has been suggested, Ms Ford was "terrified" of appearing this morning. I can't imagine why, since she has a huge black, 6'6" body guard within arms reach as she sits and as she enters and leaves the hearing room. I'm sure she must feel safe with this guy because who knows what might happen at a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing? Armed police and Capital Security can only do so much. THIS IS THEATER.

Republicans haven't laid a glove on her. Using the woman interrogator has been a mistake.

edit: why continue? Seems like everything has been covered? The poor schmuck can't possibly defend himself at this point. That weasel from Connecticut already knows everything that needs knowing, he's out in the hallway giving interviews instead of having lunch.

I hope I never am accused of something like this, with the "Me Too" climate in force. Men are on notice, submit to castration, or else. In other words, become Liberal Democrats! Yuck! I'm pretty sure they close their eyes when they kiss, males, females, animals, the HolyKuoran, etc.

https://www.thedailybeast.com/metoo-is-making-colleges-teach-toxic-masculinity-101

[ September 27, 2018, 09:45 AM: Message edited by: Leonard ]
 
Posted by Leonard (Member # 2) on September 27, 2018, 11:33 AM:
 
I am now watching Judge Kavanaugh's opening statement.
This hearing was supposed to be fair?

Ford insisted that the judge not even be in the same room. And, he wasn't.

Now, I'm watching his statement and guess who has their faces right over his shoulder, their mugs in contrast to his testimony. Both of Ford's lawyers are in perfect position to have their faces on both sides of Kavanaugh's wife.

How the hell did that happen? Ford isn't in the room but both of her "pro bono" lawyers are right there over his shoulder. This is complete bullshit! This means that the lawyers are there without pay, for strictly political reasons. Guess who paid for the "lie detector" tests? Supposedly $1,000 for the test and her lawyers paid for it. I'd like to know who paid for Ford's airline ticket and her hotel in D.C.?

This isn't fair. Democrats are the EVIL ones!

Good hunting. El Bee
 
Posted by Dave Allen (Member # 3102) on September 27, 2018, 07:04 PM:
 
http://we-go-all.net/q.html

Link is slow to load, be patient. Click on Q-Posts. If needed.

If Q is bullshit, we will find out.

He says, Judge Kavanaugh is in.

Q's quote
below.

Welcome aboard, Judge K.
Q

[ September 27, 2018, 07:25 PM: Message edited by: Dave Allen ]
 
Posted by Leonard (Member # 2) on September 30, 2018, 08:53 AM:
 
I saw a show yesterday, where there was a lot of speculation on repressed or suppressed memory.

It started out by trying to reconcile two believable witnesses. Ford believes she was a victim of attempted rape. She appears believable.

Kavanaugh claims that he never did anything like what she claims. Also appears to be believable.

So, first they started talking about that McMartin child molestation case from years ago where children were brainwashed, using dolls and other devices and eventually began believing that these things happened to them, they witnessed these things and in their mind, it was all true.

They said it took ten years to uncover the deceit and dishonesty of these child psychologists. I never understood the motives, but it all revolved around suppressed memories. Next thing you know, people suddenly had one of these "woke" moments and realized that they were victims.

So, when they testify, they appear to be believable because THEY BELIEVE THIS IS WHAT HAPPENED TO THEM. They apparently have been programed to accept certain versions of events.

Then, they went on to explain how important it is to secure the records of the therapy sessions that Ford attended with her husband to see if it involved any of this repressed memory stuff. Also, who would be against the release of these records and documents to the FBI? Debra Katz, maybe?

Anyway, it seems to be a logical answer to the conundrum, how can two people be testifying to the truth and have opposite truths. I thought it was very thought provoking and of course, it will probably never be learned. This woman might be more fucked up than we realize.

Anybody opine?

Good hunting. El Bee

One other thing. The democrats have been voicing concern, why, this man is upset, he was yelling at senators! Ask yourself what you would do if 3 women suddenly came forward at the very last minute and claimed that you committed gang rapes and similar things? I know I wouldn't sit there and defend myself without getting a little upset, at times. I think it's completely normal and does not predict that he will be a poor judge. I think it shows him as human and that's all.

[ September 30, 2018, 09:10 AM: Message edited by: Leonard ]
 
Posted by Az-Hunter (Member # 17) on September 30, 2018, 06:54 PM:
 
I didn't find her believable at all. That feigned little girl voice, unkempt hair, dirty glasses, the crying with no visible tears, a PhD, with multiple degrees, and all pertaining to psychology, and yet she still seemed dazed and confused at many of the questions and terms.....I just didn't buy it?
As to repressed memory, Ive studied up on this somewhat; and most folks involved with these types of cases claim the victim can remember very minute details of the act, from time,day,weather,location, down to the eye color and body smell of the perpetrator. I know two people that have varying degrees of sexual assault history, each can remember literally everything about the incident or incidents that happened to them. I don't buy repressed memory, when something traumatic or of a high degree of stress or emotion occurs to us, we don't fucking forget it, maybe don't like to dwell on it or keep it to the front of our minds, but you don't forget something like that.

[ September 30, 2018, 06:55 PM: Message edited by: Az-Hunter ]
 
Posted by Leonard (Member # 2) on September 30, 2018, 07:20 PM:
 
You have some good points. I don't want to give the impression that I considered her testimony credible. In fact, the way they tried everything possible to protect her, the accused goes first to prove he didn't do it, she can't be there Monday, maybe Wednesday, and NO LAWYERS! She's afraid to fly? Turns out she flies all over the world and twice on Sunday. No, I didn't personally think she looked beyond a doubt believable.

I didn't notice dirty glasses but her stringy hair bugged the shit out of me. She's 53 years old and wears her hair like she's 21 or a Farah Fawcett look a like.

But, you were paying attention.

Good hunting. El Bee
 
Posted by Paul Melching (Member # 885) on October 01, 2018, 06:26 AM:
 
Biggest sham the Dems had perpetrated on the American people What an embarrassment !
 
Posted by Leonard (Member # 2) on October 01, 2018, 06:54 AM:
 
Maybeso, but AZ peeps got their own Judas. Read about it

The result of the choices of all the "low information" devotees of the professional sports industry in Maricopa County who can quote you all the names, percentages, wages, averages of the participants therein, but haven't the foggiest notion of the names of their elected representatives who are screwing them.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3691812/posts
 
Posted by Paul Melching (Member # 885) on October 01, 2018, 06:56 AM:
 
Ford claimed she called a friend on her cell phone after the attack around 1982 , the first cell phone was sold for $3,995.00 in 1984 ! load a crap we need to purge the system come Nov.
 
Posted by Leonard (Member # 2) on October 01, 2018, 10:28 AM:
 
Picky picky on my part but did you notice how Kavanaugh drank so much bottled water? He carefully poured from the bottle to a small glass, might even call it dainty?

But earlier, Ms Ford had a liter bottle of Coke and drank right from the bottle, she don't need no stinking sissy cup! I thought the "optics" looked rather crude on her part.

I'll bet she was a little better looking when she had a chin? Maybe a 4 or 5 on her best day?

Good hunting. El Bee
 
Posted by Kokopelli (Member # 633) on October 01, 2018, 12:39 PM:
 
Hey, a GIRL that comes to PARTY with a bunch of teenagers that have BOOZE and ends up in a BEDROOM with TWO GUYS ?????

Gotta be at least a 6 ………….No??

If we're going to judge Kavanaugh for his actions 36 years ago, should we also not call a skank a skank ????? A low rent skank at that.
 
Posted by Dave Allen (Member # 3102) on October 01, 2018, 01:18 PM:
 
She probably had one of these LB.
https://8ch.net/patriotsawoken/res/11185.html
 
Posted by Leonard (Member # 2) on October 02, 2018, 07:07 AM:
 
Then, we have this reminder. Trump brings up Blumenthal's outrageous lies about "service" in Vietnam. This is so special, I can't believe the asshole actually said this?

quote:
At last week’s fiery hearing probing sexual assault allegations against Judge Brett Kavanaugh, Democratic Sen. Richard Blumenthal lectured the Supreme Court nominee on the implications of telling even a single lie.

“Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus,” Blumenthal, D-Conn., told Kavanaugh, reciting a Latin phrase. “It means 'False in one thing, false in everything.'”

But Blumenthal’s own difficult history with the truth is coming back to haunt him amid the Kavanaugh fight, with President Trump and Republican senators slamming him for inflating his military service during the Vietnam War.

In the 2000s, when Blumenthal served as Connecticut’s attorney general, he began to claim that he served in the Vietnam War. Blumenthal, repeatedly, has touted his experience during the war.

I mean, just look at this jack handle! Do you ever meet somebody that disgusts you so much, just looking at them that you want to smash their face? Well, that's how I view Richard Blumenthal. It really tells me something about the people in Connecticut, how can they keep reelecting this lying piece of shit? (his response: a few misplaced words)

Good hunting. El Bee
 
Posted by Paul Melching (Member # 885) on October 02, 2018, 07:17 AM:
 
Yes Leo we have Jeff Flake our Mormon from Gilbert If your goona join a cult join a big one ! Kinda like Harry Reid ! just enrich yourself fuk the people !
 
Posted by Kokopelli (Member # 633) on October 02, 2018, 09:40 AM:
 
Hey Paul;
Flakes phone number is 202-224-4521
I called to say 'Hi' and suggest that he at least ACT like a Republican and confirm Kavanaugh.
 
Posted by Dave Allen (Member # 3102) on October 02, 2018, 12:30 PM:
 
This should pretty much sum everything up. I mean this is such a credible individual you know.
http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/hillary-clinton-on-brett-kavanaugh-theres-a-lot-to-be-concerned-about/ar-BBNQIkU?ocid=ientp
 
Posted by Leonard (Member # 2) on October 02, 2018, 02:41 PM:
 
No, this sums up everything. Quite a long piece but the writer seems to know what he is talking about and makes sense.

https://spectator.org/predictions-and-observations-on-how-the-coming-week-will-play-out-for-the-kavanaugh-confirmation/

good hunting. El Bee
 
Posted by Leonard (Member # 2) on October 02, 2018, 04:31 PM:
 
About that chick with all the hair that went to ten parties where the boys were engaged in gang rapes. The question came up; why did she go to all these decadent parties if she knew the punch was spiked and the guys were gang raping the girls? Why indeed.

Well, they took a statement from an ex boyfriend and he said she was weird, several charges but the big reveal was that she inquired of him if he was interested in group sex? Well, there you go. That explains why she kept going to these wild events.

If true, of course. But she apparently has also been involved in a half a dozen high profile law suits. I didn't pay much attention to what they were about but who's going to take this woman seriously? Oh? Michael Avanati, the creepy porn lawyer, for one.

Good hunting. El Bee
 
Posted by Leonard (Member # 2) on October 02, 2018, 05:04 PM:
 
I got this via email:


If accusation is allowed to equal guilt, anyone can destroy anyone for any reason or no reason. This would violate the most basic and essential principles of fairness.

From: a Usual Suspect
To: bladesmn@aol.com
Sent: 9/30/2018 9:26:08 PM Eastern Standard Time
Subject: Good analysis

Isbel post, review of statements... Here's what I learned from listening to the hearings from Ford and Kavanaugh:
1) Ms. Ford stated she did not come forward for political reasons and has not been paid to come forward. Fact check: There are 3 known GoFundMe accounts in her name totalling nearly $1,000,000 dollars. She does not plan to return the money, nor has she told people not to send money.
2) She testified that she and her husband went to a therapist in 2012 while remodeling their home. They were arguing over installing a 2nd front door which she stated under oath, that she wanted as an escape route. Fact check: A check of Palo Alto building permit records show the 2nd door was installed in 2008. The record states the 2nd door was added as a separate entrance for a rental unit being developed in the home.
3) She doesn't know or remember how she got to the party. No one has come forward to take credit for taking her to the party.
4) She doesn't know or remember how she got home which was 8 miles away. No one has come forward to take credit for taking her home.
5) She doesn't know or remember when the party was.
6) She doesn't know or remember where the party was.
7) She said she does remember it was Kavanaugh.
8) She was sketchy on how many people were at the party.
9) She was 15 years old, at a party without adult supervision and without her parents knowledge, drinking illegally.
10) She said she was so upset that she was almost raped that she fled the party, leaving her best friend behind with these almost rapists.
11) She said she heard people talking about her at the party after the incident. She doesn't know or remember what they were saying. Questions: How did she hear them talking about her if she fled the house? How does she know they were talking about her if she doesn't know or remember what they were saying?
12) All of the witnesses that she named have provided statements saying it never happened, and also vouched for the good character of Kavenaugh.
13) Ford said she called her friends on her cell phone when she got home to tell them what had happened. She stated the party was in 1982. Fact check: The first cell phone was not available for sale until 1984.
14) Feinstein was deceptive and violated the rules of the judiciary committee by keeping the letter secret from the chairman and other committee members for 60 days. She never questioned Kavanaugh about it when she met with him before the confirmation hearings.
15) Someone leaked the letter to the press. The only people who had the letter were Ford, her lawyer, Feinstein, and the Democratic Senator from her state. Feinstein became very flustered and could not be sure if her office leaked the letter. Her reaction to the question seemed very suspicious. She turned to ask her staff member who was present, if her office had given the letter to the press.
16) Ford was never told by Feinstein or her lawyer that the Senators on the judiciary commitee would come to her for her statement or that it could have been done in private. Ford, her lawyer, and Feinstein decided her statement should be given publicly.
17) Ford stated the reason she did not want to come and provide a statement earlier was because she has a fear of flying. However, she has taken many trips where she traveled by air to Hawaii, Tahiti, etc. She also flew to Delaware where she had been hiding out since the letter was leaked. Why did she not just drive from Delaware to meet with the commitee? She doesn't know who paid for the airline ticket to Delaware.
18) Even though she said she wanted to remain anonymous, she hired a lawyer and took a polygraph test the first week of August, less than two weeks after sending the letter. The polygraph test consisted of two questions. She doesn't know who ordered or paid for the polygraph.
19) She deleted her Facebook and Twitter social media accounts before sending the letter.
20) Her attorney claims to be handling the Ford case pro bono but was hired by Feinstein.
21) Kavanaugh was very passionate in his denial, as anyone would be under a false accusation that is destroying his reputation, his family and children, and his career.
22) He likes beer and drank in high school at the legal age of 18.
23) He graduated top in his class, played basketball and football.
24) He recorded his scheduled activities in a caledar. His father preserved these calendars along with other school memorabilia such as trophies, essays, etc. in their attic.
25) The Republicans questioning Ford were respectful.
26)The Democrats were not respectful of Kavanaugh and didn't really ask any questions other than to try to get him to ask for an FBI investigation.
Summary and observations: After reviewing the testemony provided by both, I have personally come to the following conclusions based on evidence and observations:
1) I think both statements were presented in a believable manner, but the burden of proof is on the accuser, and that didn't happen.
2) I have a problem with Ms. Ford's credibility due to the contradiction of having 3 GoGundMe accounts with no plans to return the money. I had a problem with her statement that she was so distressed that she needed an extra door installed during a 2012 renovation on her home when it was actually installed in 2008 for a rental unit being prepared. I have a problem believing her statement that she has a fear of flying when in fact she had flown many, many times. I felt suspicious that something incriminating was in her social media leading her to delete her Facebook and Twitter accounts.
3) She admitted to being deceitful to her parents who did not know she was at a party without adult supervision.
4) Her behavior leading up to the hearing appears to be staged and calculated. She appears to have been coached.
5) Kavenaugh had his parents, his wife, and many friends at the hearing in support of him.
6)There was not a single family member or friend at the hearings in support of Ford. Where was her husband or the beach friends she claims gave her advice and encouraged her to come forward. The friends whom she has named as witnesses claim the incident never happened.
7) Kavanaugh has been vetted by the FBI six different times and not one thing has ever come up. Ford has only been asked two questions on a non admissible polygraph.
8 I believe something happened to Ford, but I don't believe Kavanaugh did it.
9) I believe that Kavanaugh's display of righteous anger is a justified response to this serious accusation.
10) I believe Feinstein and the Democrats are using mentally weak Ford as a political pawn.
11) The Democrats have stated they will go to any length to not lose this seat on the Supreme Court because this confirmation will change the Supreme Court for the next generation. This tells me that Democrats are even willing to assassinate the good character of an innocent person and destroy a family for political reasons in order to accomplish their goal.
12) Democrats have stated they are going to keep trying to delay the confirmation until after the midterms.

Based on these facts and observations, I feel certain Judge Kavenaugh is innocent of this accusation. If I were on the judiciary commitee, I would vote to confirm Judge Kavanaugh, not for political reasons, but because he most definitely qualified. #confirmKavenaughnow #votered2018 #redwave2018 #Trump2020
Sent from my iPhone
 
Posted by Az-Hunter (Member # 17) on October 02, 2018, 06:51 PM:
 
Maybe Im splitting hairs, but every time I hear that discussion on the talking head shows about boys lined up to gang rape the girl in the room, is that another way of describing what most of us remember hearing about some chick pulling a train?
There was always that one girl or two that had no compunction about getting fucked up and fucking a bunch of guys at a party, if that was the case in the topic at hand, isn't the term gang rape a stretch?
The girl in the "room" maybe wanted to get fucked, otherwise you'd think she, whoever she is, would be coming forward? Instead of the girls who saw the guys lined up, coming forward.
 
Posted by Leonard (Member # 2) on October 03, 2018, 10:02 AM:
 
I think all that pulling a train talk is just that, stupid boy high school bullshit with no basis in fact. Everybody has heard the fairytale but personally, I never met anybody that said; Hell yeah I did it and it was fabulous! I think everybody kept their mouth shut because at that point 90% of those guys were still working at trying to get to first base. And, if boys in high school were good at anything, it is/was at talking experience about something they didn't know much about. I knew maybe 6-12 boys in school that had a very steady girlfriend but the majority were probably dating a different girl every week. If that.

As far as drugs, maybe I ran with the wrong crowd but we didn't have drugs besides alcohol. Excuse my bias but the only ones we knew that smoked grass in the parking lot were the Tacos. (Cholos) But the Mexican American guys I knew were just like everybody else, I'm talking about the ones over in Hicks Camp, a local neighborhood ghetto. Nobody else knew a damned thing about drugs or date rape drugs. We had all heard of "Spanish Fly" but I don't know anybody that actually bought it or used it?

I read this morning that the Dems are crying that the FBI isn't interviewing 30 or 40 people with real important stuff, so this investigation, that they have concluded will find nothing, is bogus. As everybody already knows, the Democrats won't be happy until this nomination is withdrawn. It seems so bizarre that they are willing to go this far into the gutter over Roe v Wade?

They know they have a sketchy constitutional right and any subsequent review of the issue is liable to turn out the opposite. I'm bewildered? Would that be the end of the world for those people? They act like it. But, a little common sense about all the options available for birth control? Sending coat hangers to their senator? Don't they understand the number of remedies available to prevent pregnancies, not to mention the clinics that will do a D&C. But we have the hysterical screaming, afraid that kavanaugh singlehandedly will overturn their most sacred "right", & so fearful that they are going to extreme lengths to prevent this appointment. It's really not rational. The extent they will go, to prevent a 5th vote is amazing. And, this is just a possibility, down the road.

I'm reasonably sure that IF this Roe v Wade is ever reversed, they will find relief, somewhere, somehow? In the meantime, this asinine behavior is borderline crazy, not to mention dishonest. But that's what we are dealing with, Liberals have a mental illness and we spend way too much time catering to their ideas, and their mandatory solutions.

Excuse the rant.
Good hunting. El Bee

[ October 03, 2018, 10:12 AM: Message edited by: Leonard ]
 
Posted by Bomba (Member # 71) on October 04, 2018, 05:55 AM:
 
Bomba concerned about situation so talked to Chief.
Chief say:
quote:
Some human truly believe they are Napoleon.
Only difference between them and Ford are window bars, locked doors, walls and fence.



[ October 04, 2018, 05:56 AM: Message edited by: Bomba ]
 
Posted by Leonard (Member # 2) on October 04, 2018, 07:45 AM:
 
Bomba so profound this time, I don’t understand any of it?

Tell Uncle Jay Hi, for all of us!

Good hunting. El Bee 🐝
 
Posted by Paul Melching (Member # 885) on October 05, 2018, 05:37 AM:
 
Hey Bomba go shit in your hat !
 
Posted by Bomba (Member # 71) on October 05, 2018, 07:33 AM:
 
At first Bomba believe she had bad experience but not with K. Then later believe experience totally manufactured in her mind. Spookier than mud hut cat.
 
Posted by Dave Allen (Member # 3102) on October 05, 2018, 07:47 AM:
 
MKULtra.

(edit for photo)
https://media.8ch.net/file_store/91f4077c912349bf4e65b92965bb800f88c51318d360c379822908243d415d81.jpeg

[ October 05, 2018, 09:12 AM: Message edited by: Dave Allen ]
 
Posted by Leonard (Member # 2) on October 05, 2018, 09:15 AM:
 
I don't ever want to live in a country where Bomba has lost his Mojo. It's just not right.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y9C0DYjFZLw

[ October 05, 2018, 09:18 AM: Message edited by: Leonard ]
 
Posted by Dave Allen (Member # 3102) on October 05, 2018, 09:56 AM:
 
Look's like Murkowski is feeling some pressure ?
https://media.8ch.net/file_store/6d7ed0e495dec06faafe9fe873768becf7450a4b 75846d6b9062f9a13ad4959c.jpg

Feinstein=PURE EVIL

[ October 05, 2018, 09:58 AM: Message edited by: Dave Allen ]
 
Posted by Leonard (Member # 2) on October 06, 2018, 09:02 AM:
 
That Murkowski is an idiot! Didn't she get appointed when her husband died....or something like that? I hope she's defeated next election. That Heidkamp in Dakota N? she should be defeated also, we don't need that type. But the vindictiveness on the Left knows no bounds, they are all after the Maine senator for voting "yes". Collins?

If only the Republicans were the same way; TAKE NO PRISONERS ! Well, today's the day. I will enjoy the reactions on the Left! It is a mental illness. The demonstrators are just useful idiots. They don't even have a firm grasp on the issues.

Speaking of which: my "favorite" wishy washy AZ senator is a "yes", unless something BIG comes up? The sooner he's out of politics, the better.

Good hunting. El Bee

[ October 06, 2018, 09:03 AM: Message edited by: Leonard ]
 
Posted by Dave Allen (Member # 3102) on October 06, 2018, 10:01 AM:
 
She's in until 2022 I think ? Palin is already firing shots across her bow.

Q said a long time ago it's not R's vs D's

It's good vs Evil..

This is exactly what we are witnessing if one is awake enough to pay attention.

As a whole the D's are worse than the R's

Many Republicans are terrible people maybe even Evil. The Democrats are far worse, thus DJT siding with the R's..

If things go as planned, I could see two new party's even if they go by the same old names.

It has too be good. Either way. Or were screwed.

Y'all know who's running things right ? in particular the D's..

It should be obvious by now.

God Bless

[ October 06, 2018, 10:02 AM: Message edited by: Dave Allen ]
 
Posted by tedo (Member # 4320) on October 06, 2018, 10:03 AM:
 
Lisa Murkowski was appointed by her father Frank Murkowski after he was elected govenor of Alaska. Prior to his one term stint as govenor he was a US Senator for Alaska. He was a lousy governor and was beaten in the primary by Sara Palin who was elected governor then her VP bid with McCain. In her bid for reelection, Murkowski was was defeated in the primary but was able to pull out a win with write in votes by promising free stuff to the native population. When I moved to Alaska in 1980 the local politicians were not as slick as their counter parts in the lower 48 but by the time I left in 2014 they had become every bit their equal i.e.. Begich defeating long time senator Ted Stevens after bogus charges filed. A unusual side note to Alaska politics, they have had the same representative in congress since statehood, Don Young.
 
Posted by Leonard (Member # 2) on October 06, 2018, 12:27 PM:
 
Well, looks like he is appointed by a vote of 50-48. The rabble outside aren't sure what to do until they get their "bail money" and their further direction.

Meanwhile, I'm looking at CNN. Five females are holding a little session and it looks like a death in the family. I seem to detect a theme along the lines of "Believe women" and they expect Kavanaugh to take the bench and sit on the "far right". Also, he will continue to have a cloud over his head....they say?

This is (literally) the end of the world; as we know it! Stay tuned to CNN for MORE REACTION ! Yawn. I think I have something more important to do, rearrange my sock drawer.

But watching their misery and gloating is pretty special.

Good hunting. El Bee
 
Posted by Alaskan Yoter (Member # 169) on October 06, 2018, 06:05 PM:
 
Murkowski was appointed her position at first by her father, due to a loop hole in the system. Then its been the special interest native groups keeping her in office. I think she has ever had a Conservative/Republican backing from the public.....ever. It appears the last day or so most Alaskans on board with kicking her to the curb.

Now rumors have it Palin might throw her hat in the ring in 2020. While she might be the lessor of the two evils, she's just as bad. She really has no Alaska following, even though the lower 48 seem to be enamored with her.
 
Posted by Alaskan Yoter (Member # 169) on October 06, 2018, 06:07 PM:
 
Correction "I don't think she has ever had a Conservative/Republican backing from the public.....ever."
 
Posted by Lone Howl (Member # 29) on October 06, 2018, 06:28 PM:
 
Look...an Alaskan!^^
 
Posted by Kokopelli (Member # 633) on October 07, 2018, 07:01 AM:
 
The Despicable Dems are in the full panic mode for good reason.
LIFETIME APPOINTMENT !!!!!
The Court in now solidly conservative.
Now....
If they lose the mid-term election they're bend over the log and squeal like a pig fuked and they know it.
 
Posted by Leonard (Member # 2) on October 07, 2018, 11:01 AM:
 
There have been all sorts of reading of the tea leaves. Same tea leafs but different conclusions. This will energize the Left! And, this will cause conservatives to support Republicans in large numbers. Huh?

Frankly, I don't see a "shellacking" like Obama endured in his Saintly fashion? I see Conservatives holding on; if barely. A win is a win. By a Landslide or by the skin of their teeth. I'm not particularly good at reading Tea Leaves.

I have a gut feeling that Fly Over Country will prevail. After eight miserable years of Muslimanomics, we deserve an undisturbed
first Trump term. I've said it before, say what you will about what a jerk he is; but I cannot fault his actions. Just to pick a name, he has been a lot more consistent and successful than say, George Bush, who got a little flaccid on the Iraq war.

BTW his wife is a total BABE!

Good hunting. El Bee
 
Posted by Dave Allen (Member # 3102) on October 08, 2018, 11:35 AM:
 
https://cdn.qmap.pub/images/005bcbbb9003847fe9a289e8a479d206e426cbc548270a68ed20f271dbb23af8.jpg
 




Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.0