This is topic how true do you think this is? in forum Member forum at The New Huntmastersbbs!.
To visit this topic, use this URL:
https://www.huntmastersbbs.com/cgi-bin/cgi-ubb/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=6;t=004279
Posted by NVWalt (Member # 375) on August 08, 2015, 07:04 AM:
I think this has merit.But don't believe for one second our spineless, worthless, do nothing politicians will take off their gay loving little girl panties and do anything that is right for America.
The Obama/Iran deal needs to be looked upon in another light.
Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ)
ART. 104. AIDING THE ENEMY
Any person who--
(1) aids, or attempts to aid, the enemy with arms, ammunition, supplies, money, or other things; or
(2) without proper authority, knowingly harbors or protects or gives intelligence to or communicates or corresponds with or holds any intercourse with the enemy, either directly or indirectly;shall suffer death or such other punishment as a court-martial or military commission may direct.
Is Iran a professed enemy of the United States? Yes, they unquestionably are. Is Obama's attempt to give them 150 billion dollars a form of aid and money? Is Obama's attempt to have sanctions on Iran lifted a form of aid and new source of money? Is enabling Iran to purchase arms, ammunition and supplies with the 150 billion and money from sanctions being lifted another form of aid? Is enabling Iran to purchase ballistic missiles in 8 years helping them to acquire more weaponry? I am sure everyone can see where this is going. Last question. If Obama is the commander and chief of our military, doesn't it go without saying that he is subject to the same rules as our soldiers and military brass are in regards to acts of treason?
Posted by DAA (Member # 11) on August 08, 2015, 07:27 AM:
>shrug<
Same logic could have been applied to just about every president I can think of. Our gov't has worked with the enemy repeatedly, constantly. It's standard operating procedure. Used to be the USSR and eastern block countries. Steady sprinkling of small players throughout, too. It's just how things work.
I think the deal will get done. In one form or another. Most of the republicans shouting it down, are just posturing. They want it done as much as anyone else. Just have to put on appearances, then pretend to be outraged when it happens. But most of them want to see it happen, for one reason or another.
I know I'm not in the mood to pay for another war over there. And that, basically, is the alternative.
- DAA
Posted by Moe (Member # 4494) on August 08, 2015, 07:32 AM:
"The Treason Clause applies only to disloyal acts committed during times of war."
At this time war with Iran has not been declared.
There has been a series of acts by this president that should make people wonder where his loyalties lie. We won the war in Iraq yet he pulled out the troops early opening up the country to ISIS takeover. Was that his plan? He has actually aided in arming ISIS. When you see the pictures of ISIS driving a long line of white Toyota Tundras you should realize that all of those vehicles were purchased with US taxpayer dollars.
Considering his refusal to enforce the laws of this country and allowing illegals to flood the country and for other acts congress has every right to impeach him yet they don't.
Posted by Leonard (Member # 2) on August 08, 2015, 07:46 AM:
Because: racist.
Posted by Moe (Member # 4494) on August 08, 2015, 08:36 AM:
The entire reason the Democrats through Hillary under the bus and supported Obama in the first place was because as a black man he could get away with a lot more. Calling you a racist has far more weight than calling you a woman hater.
So you're right.
UBB.classicTM
6.3.0